[Gumlegs]

It's obvious from celmak's postings that he/she/it finds homosexual behavior repellent. Thus, the accusation that coyoteman might engage in such behavior is a personal attack. The accusation has nothing whatever to do with an argument about science, so celmak would appear to flunk the logic test as well.

I was taking celmak's words as what they were obviously intended to be, a personal attack.

There used to be some rule around here about "no personal attacks." I'm given to understand it's not invoked mucj any more when the personal attacks are directed at someone who has the temerity to defend science against the Yahoos, but for the sake of balance, it might be interesting to try and apply it equally.

Or is that idea now offensive?

[Gumlegs]

That would be “much” not “mucj” in sentence two, paragraph three, above.

[celmak]

It's obvious from celmak's postings that he/she/it...

IT??? Oh, I am so hurt by your PERSONAL attack! Why, I think I'll just do what Coyoteman does and whine to the moderator of such brutality! This kind of behavior should invoke more Evos to uphold the rule of censorship "MUCJ (SIC)" more !!!

LOL! That felt good!

PS to Gumlegs: Thanks for proving my point.

[savagesusie]

It's obvious from celmak's postings that he/she/it finds homosexual behavior repellent.

Well, isn't it???? Who could say that it isn't???? HA! Can you admit the TRUTH---that is all that Ben Stein is exposing....the TRUTH. I can not wait to see Expelled!

[Ethan Clive Osgoode]

It's obvious from celmak's postings that he/she/it finds homosexual behavior repellent

Preumably you do not, so why do you find his comment "vile" and "offensive"? Let me speculate... you're just tossing around some fake moral-highground outrage, playing for sympathy from the audience. No?

[editor-surveyor]

There used to be some rule around here about "no personal attacks."

Since when is making a factual statement an 'attack?'