Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Testing Shows XP Still Outperforms Vista
ChannelWeb ^ | April 4, 2008 | Samara Lynn

Posted on 04/06/2008 5:31:58 AM PDT by Notary Sojac

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: Notary Sojac
We have XP boxes, one Vista box, and two W2K boxes running in this house (I run XP Pro for work on my laptop,)

I love my W2K. Compared to many OS's it's frigging bullet-proof.

41 posted on 04/06/2008 8:50:32 AM PDT by 2111USMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PushinTin

I find the best Windows XP security measure is to boot up without admin privileges, and to do all my program installs and internet activity inside a VirtualBox VM.


42 posted on 04/06/2008 9:06:40 AM PDT by Notary Sojac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: 2111USMC

Roger that. Win2000 really is the best thing Microsoft ever released.


43 posted on 04/06/2008 9:08:09 AM PDT by Notary Sojac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: aft_lizard

Yes and no. Sure on the one hand the machines an OS was “designed” for give a fairer comparison, but real world usage is on flat machines. You’re going to buy a machine with a set of statistics and you’re going to want the most out of that machine, so comparing the two on identical hardware is reasonable. And they did make the machine better than MS says is the minimum for Vista, so it’s not like they cut it’s knees out from under it.


44 posted on 04/06/2008 10:09:36 AM PDT by discostu (aliens ate my Buick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
Linux has its own problems. Staying with XP is best, but we need somebody like Google to get into the OS market.

I agree with you about Linux. It is great for servers, but it needs years of labor and billions of dollars invested in R&D before it will be ready as a mainstream consumer operating system. A company like Dell or Google or IBM could make the level of investment that Desktop Linux requires to make it a decent product, but so far they've shown no willingness to do so.

In my opinion, for the foreseeable future, the best OS for most computer users is Mac OS X.

45 posted on 04/06/2008 10:53:32 AM PDT by HAL9000 ("If someone who has access to the press says something over and over again, people believe it"- B.C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac
Win2000 really is the best thing Microsoft ever released.

The BASIC interpreter Microsoft released in 1978 was truly amazing, with hand-tuned machine language code designed by Bill Gates himself - but it's been downhill since then in terms of code quality.

46 posted on 04/06/2008 10:56:47 AM PDT by HAL9000 ("If someone who has access to the press says something over and over again, people believe it"- B.C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62; backhoe; Boundless; Democrat_media; HAL9000
we need somebody like Google to get into the OS market.

gOS beta here.

(not a Google OS, but it looks like it's trying to be one)

47 posted on 04/06/2008 11:43:14 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

>> we need somebody like Google to get into the OS market.

> (not a Google OS, but it looks like it’s trying to be one)

“gOS is developed by Good OS LLC out of Los Angeles. It’s based on Ubuntu Linux 7.10 and runs the Enlightenment E17 interface instead of KDE or Gnome. Despite not being created by Google, the focus of gOS is Google’s online applications such as GMail, Google News, Google Maps, Google Calendar, YouTube, etc. It’s a neat concept for a Linux distribution, but how practical is it? We’ll find out in this review.”
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1558,2219310,00.asp

Google hasn’t sent them a Cease and Desist, so one might
conclude that the big G hasn’t any immediate plans for
a Google o.s.


48 posted on 04/06/2008 11:54:41 AM PDT by Boundless (Legacy Media is hazardous to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
but we need somebody like Google to get into the OS market.

I had the same thought just last night while watching a program on how Google started, etc.

I thought, "When Google decides to get into the OS business, it could be the move that eventually cripples Microsoft."

49 posted on 04/06/2008 12:26:38 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (A couple of pints and a package of crisps....ahhh. Life's good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac
Our CRN Test Center conducted a faceoff-type of performance evaluation. Testing was done on two identical desktops: HP (NYSE:HPQ)'s rp5700 model with a single 160 GB SATA drive on each machine, 1.8 GHz dual-core Intel (NSDQ:INTC) processors and 1 GB RAM on both.

It's common knowledge that Vista has to have 2gb of ram as a sort of a floor. Memory is cheap enough now that a claim of something like this to be a reasonable test is BS.

50 posted on 04/06/2008 12:54:39 PM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aft_lizard
The big issue with Windows Vista is generally NOT the CPU--it's the amount of RAM installed. If you get a more recent motherboard that allows a single-core CPU to access as much as 3.6 GB of RAM in 32-bit mode, Windows Vista runs actually fairly well. Mind you, I'd rather get a motherboard that really supports more than 4 GB of RAM such as the ECS P965T-A.
51 posted on 04/06/2008 4:46:27 PM PDT by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Democrat_media
“The lesson is it will take a miracle to unseat MS”

I don't think you need a miracle just a better product that is produced by thinking and hard work.

If that were the case, Xerox and Novell would both be market leaders in the computer industry. Sorry to burst your bubble, but it all boils down to marketing, pricing, and getting the product into the collective minds of those who make the purchasing decisions.

Unfortunately the quality of the product (unless it's completely unusable) doesn't really matter all that much.

Mark

52 posted on 04/07/2008 4:10:01 AM PDT by MarkL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

Walmart If i remember correctly tried selling very low cost linux machines at $200 each! http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/1108/
Problem is they didn’t sell well so Walmart pulled them : http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/10/wal-mart-is-pulling-plug-on-in-store-gpc-experiment/. If Linux was better ( had all plug and play drivers etc.) then it would unseat microsoft and the fact that walmart was selling LInux PCs at $200 a pop could have provided the push Linux needed to unseat Microsoft. Linux is just too hard to use for the average joe. FYI Wal-Mart is still selling these $200 linux machines online but not in their stores. So an average Joe would rather pay $700 for a Microsoft machine that is easier to use than a $200 Linux machine that they find difficult to use. So Microsoft here still provides the better product.

Firefox however does seem to making headway against Internet Explorer. Again a better product unseating a Microsoft product.


53 posted on 04/16/2008 7:33:08 AM PDT by Democrat_media (Socialism will destroy a country economically. why dems & Mccain for Socialism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson