To: dayglored
better than ... ed. Vi at least.
vi sucks, in my view. I much prefer
ed. The vi command was derived from Version 6 ed, whereas some nice little improvements that were made in Version 7 ed never made it to vi.
Back then, we ran a group of 10 or 20 people, as simultaneous interactive users, on a 256 Mb DEC PDP 11/45, running Version 6 or 7 full blown Unix.
43 posted on
04/05/2008 1:08:35 AM PDT by
ThePythonicCow
(By their false faith in Man as God, the left would destroy us. They call this faith change.)
To: ThePythonicCow
Oops -- 256 Mb Kb DEC PDP 11/45
45 posted on
04/05/2008 5:10:23 AM PDT by
ThePythonicCow
(By their false faith in Man as God, the left would destroy us. They call this faith change.)
To: ThePythonicCow
>
vi sucks, in my view. I much prefer ed. The vi command was derived from Version 6 ed, whereas some nice little improvements that were made in Version 7 ed never made it to vi. Oh, we agree that vi sucks. I prefer modeless screen editing.
But I'm confused. The ed I know (/bin/ed) is strictly a line editor -- you even have to request a prompt 'P'. I use it when I have to edit /etc/fstab from a single-user shell when a crashed system refuses to boot with fsck hung on a failed drive. But it's only marginally better than writing with a sharp pointy stick and a pile of poo, for anything more complicated than a 10-line config file.
Are we talking about the same ed?
46 posted on
04/05/2008 7:13:57 AM PDT by
dayglored
(Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson