Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dayglored
vi sucks, in my view. I much prefer ed. The vi command was derived from Version 6 ed, whereas some nice little improvements that were made in Version 7 ed never made it to vi.

Back then, we ran a group of 10 or 20 people, as simultaneous interactive users, on a 256 Mb DEC PDP 11/45, running Version 6 or 7 full blown Unix.

43 posted on 04/05/2008 1:08:35 AM PDT by ThePythonicCow (By their false faith in Man as God, the left would destroy us. They call this faith change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: ThePythonicCow

45 posted on 04/05/2008 5:10:23 AM PDT by ThePythonicCow (By their false faith in Man as God, the left would destroy us. They call this faith change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: ThePythonicCow
> vi sucks, in my view. I much prefer ed. The vi command was derived from Version 6 ed, whereas some nice little improvements that were made in Version 7 ed never made it to vi.

Oh, we agree that vi sucks. I prefer modeless screen editing.

But I'm confused. The ed I know (/bin/ed) is strictly a line editor -- you even have to request a prompt 'P'. I use it when I have to edit /etc/fstab from a single-user shell when a crashed system refuses to boot with fsck hung on a failed drive. But it's only marginally better than writing with a sharp pointy stick and a pile of poo, for anything more complicated than a 10-line config file.

Are we talking about the same ed?

46 posted on 04/05/2008 7:13:57 AM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson