At the end of the day these companies work on the Linux kernel in order to make money off the product. They understand that improving the kernel for all will benefit themselves as well. GE will probably be along shortly to deny all of this, but the facts are pretty evident.
1 posted on
04/02/2008 5:41:42 AM PDT by
twntaipan
To: twntaipan
2 posted on
04/02/2008 5:42:45 AM PDT by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
To: twntaipan
3 posted on
04/02/2008 5:51:11 AM PDT by
xcamel
(Forget the past and you're doomed to repeat it.)
To: twntaipan; rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...
4 posted on
04/02/2008 6:52:47 AM PDT by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
Yes, as a guy whose only social life is playing D&D, I admit that I did not have any part in the creation Linux.
5 posted on
04/02/2008 6:59:02 AM PDT by
TOWER
To: twntaipan
1) Red Hat, 11.2 percent 2) Novell, 8.9 percent 3) IBM, 8.3 percent 4) Intel, 4.1 percent 5) LF, 3.5 percent 6) SGI, 2.0 percent 7) MIPS Technology, 1.6 percent 8) Oracle,...----
At the end of the day these companies work on the Linux kernel in order to make money off the product. They understand that improving the kernel for all will benefit themselves as well. GE will probably be along shortly to deny all of this, but the facts are pretty evident.
Jeez, ALL these companies are in league with the Chinese government? Damn socialists!
6 posted on
04/02/2008 7:13:13 AM PDT by
MichiganMan
(Remember when Linkin Park wasn't on your mom's radio station?)
To: twntaipan
In fact, the top five developers, Al Viro (1.9 percent of the total percentage of changes to the kernel); David Miller (1.8 percent); Adrian Bunk (1.7 percent); Ralf Baechle (1.6 percent); and Andrew Morton (1.5 percent), alone accounted for 8.5 percent of Linux’s recent code changes.
Fred Brooks (The Mythical Man Month) is proven correct yet again. His thesis has always been that a few key people are what drive big engineering projects, and that adding people to a project can slow it down instead of speed it up.
Or put another way, if a woman can make a baby in 9 months, it’s not true that 9 women can make a baby in 1 month.
To: twntaipan
Who Really Creates Linux? Algore?
8 posted on
04/02/2008 8:11:23 AM PDT by
Born Conservative
(Chronic Positivity - http://jsher.livejournal.com/)
To: twntaipan
So how do these companies make money off the product? AFAIK it’s a breach of the usage license of Linux to sell it (although I have no idea who’d sue you for it). I get the idea of competitive collaboration to improve a product, but if the product can’t be sold, why are these companies paying people to work on it?
9 posted on
04/02/2008 8:18:27 AM PDT by
Turbopilot
(iumop ap!sdn w,I 'aw dlaH)
To: twntaipan
Some people are still under the delusion that Linux is written by unwashed hackers living in their parents' basements whose only social life is playing D&D and having flame wars over IRC (Internet Relay Chat) about whether vi or EMACS better and debating Picard versus Kirk. Written, no - just advocated by. ;)
(Sorry, I'm an OS/X advocate...)
13 posted on
04/02/2008 9:00:56 AM PDT by
Mr. Jeeves
("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
To: twntaipan
It was inevitable that the geeky kids churning out code in their parents’ basements would grow up and get paying jobs.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson