Dr. Gould was the rare honest evolutionist.
The rest are dishonest, like all the evo supporters here, totally lacking in moral fiber, and unwilling to address the truth.
The rest are dishonest, like all the evo supporters here, totally lacking in moral fiber, and unwilling to address the truth.
Bullshit.
So you are my judge? And I have no moral fiber? Gosh. You must show me where in the Bible you were given such privileges, yes?
I think you just called me a liar.
Since we've been told repeatedly that science isn't about truth or proof, how could you expect anything else? If science isn't about truth, then what else is left for it to be about?
Thing I still can't figure out is without knowing what the truth is, so many evos accuse others of lying. In order to determine if something is a lie, you have to have truth to compare it to. Without any knowledge of the truth, there's simply no way to determine if something is a lie.
The rest are dishonest, like all the evo supporters here, totally lacking in moral fiber, and unwilling to address the truth.
editor-surveyor,
I wish you weren't so right.
But the fact is that in the past few days I've seen so many claims to ample evidence supporting big bang, "goo to you by way of the zoo," and so on. And so often I have genuinely asked for the best evidence, and so far, I get none.
They sure do actually appear to be holding it by faith without admitting it, as a general rule.
They also have been, so far, completely unwilling to address the truth, or even discuss the actual issues.
I was really hoping to hear some answers!
Keep up the good work,
-Jesse