Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jamie Lee Curtis: 'I'm posing topless at 50 'to show older women they can still be beautiful'
Daily Mail ^ | 22nd March 2008

Posted on 03/23/2008 10:44:24 AM PDT by Sawdring

Jamie Lee Curtis has agreed to pose topless to mark her 50th birthday.

The actress said she would bare all to convince older women that they can still be beautiful if they take care of their bodies.

Her topless pose will appear on May's cover of the magazine of the American Association of Retired Persons, the U.S. equivalent of Saga.


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: curtis; exhibitionism; sagawards
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-223 next last
To: Sawdring

Jamie Lee Curtis sets the moral tone for the new American culture.


21 posted on 03/23/2008 10:51:11 AM PDT by donna (ADHD - Absent Dad/Husband Disorder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring

22 posted on 03/23/2008 10:51:25 AM PDT by Pistolshot (Remember, no matter how bad your life is, someone is watching and enjoying your suffering.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring

The girl ain’t a looker, but she does have a nice body, even at 50. Her children are adopted, and she has take care of herself over the years. I for one look forward to the unveiling. But then again, I think women grow into their beauty over time.


23 posted on 03/23/2008 10:52:07 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Guns don't kill people, gun free zones kill people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pistolshot

NOT GUILTY


24 posted on 03/23/2008 10:52:17 AM PDT by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring
What a shame. We don't need to see her without clothing to know she is a beautiful woman. It's just sad that she has reached this stage of her life and has yet to appreciate the meaning of dignity and self respect.
25 posted on 03/23/2008 10:52:28 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring

26 posted on 03/23/2008 10:54:03 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring

I’m still trying to figure out she thinks 50 is old.


27 posted on 03/23/2008 10:54:20 AM PDT by svcw (The main thing is to keep the main thing the main thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
Most likely urban myth. In any case it would be no one's business but her own.

Many such cases involve female infants with "additions" ~ sometimes the child's adrenal glands continue to produce excess testosterone leading to lifelong difficulties.

Just be happy you don't have this problem.

28 posted on 03/23/2008 10:54:21 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring

Making mom proud one more time.


29 posted on 03/23/2008 10:54:48 AM PDT by ScratInTheHat (Don't like my immigration stance? I'm dyslexic. PC keeps sounding like BS to me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring

She looked good without her top in Trading Places but that was over 20 years ago.


30 posted on 03/23/2008 10:54:51 AM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

>>>>But then again, I think women grow into their beauty over time.

That means Helen Thomas is way, way overgrown? :)


31 posted on 03/23/2008 10:54:59 AM PDT by Keith in Iowa (<<<Life's a bitch, don't elect one President.>>>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

The whole article is misleading. The picture shows her topless just barely past her shoulders...hardly what I think of when I hear “topless photo”.


32 posted on 03/23/2008 10:55:03 AM PDT by Junior_G
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper
Mentioning this old bat Helen Thomas in this context is an encouragement enough for her. Big Mistake on your part.
33 posted on 03/23/2008 10:55:46 AM PDT by alecqss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring
"The actress said she would bare all to convince older women that they can still be beautiful if they take care of their bodies."

i.e. - She's an attention whore.

34 posted on 03/23/2008 10:56:18 AM PDT by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring
picking nits here, but, they officially changed their name to be AARP.
It should be: formerly known as "American Association of Retired Persons".
35 posted on 03/23/2008 10:56:58 AM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring

Big deal.

36 posted on 03/23/2008 10:57:11 AM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Junior_G

“The whole article is misleading. The picture shows her topless just barely past her shoulders...hardly what I think of when I hear “topless photo”.”

Indeed if its the same photo I’ve seen. The Daily Mail has a tendency to print things to grab attention/stir emotion and which are really no big deal when you see the whole picture - no pun intended.


37 posted on 03/23/2008 10:58:28 AM PDT by Mac1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

The dirty secret is that “she” is really Richard Dean Anderson in drag.


38 posted on 03/23/2008 10:58:42 AM PDT by Content Provider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring

Is she going through the change?

Are her hormones out of balance causing her to think and act this way.


39 posted on 03/23/2008 10:59:01 AM PDT by Dustbunny (Freedom prospers when religion is vibrant and the rule of law under God is acknowledged. The Gipper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring

Translation: career needs a jump-start, she’s sick of doing little kids’ movies.


40 posted on 03/23/2008 10:59:12 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Liberals: can't live with them, can't ship them to Canada.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-223 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson