To my eyes, it's far superior to Apple's version.
Agreed. The first one is clearer/sharper. Could that be because I’m using Firefox?!
The second example in post 8 seems much clearer than the one you posted.
Here they are together - it's easier to compare them this way -
Mac OS X - |
Windows - |
In my opinion, the Mac OS X font rendering technology does a better job on sub-pixel anti-aliasing, character spacing, kerning, ligatures and the shaping of the glyphs. The Mac OS X text looks more natural and is easier to read on the screen, like ink printed on paper.
Crappy typography is one of the main reasons why I can't tolerate Windows as my primary computer. Since I must spend several hours per day working with text on a computer screen, I'll stick with the better solution: Mac OS X.
While Windows with ClearType has a more airy feel, it’s because the kerning sucks. And the airy feel is because someone has set ClearType to that, as it can be set to make the letters have a fuller look like OS X, but still with the bad kerning.