Every time I watch that show, I say to the family, "That's what I want to do when I grow up!" :-)
bump
I was a little surprised that they didn't do the lead balloon with hydrogen, rather than helium, but as it turns out helium has about 92% of the lifting power of hydrogen, since it's the difference in density from air, not the density itself, that counts.
Just wouldn't want to be the soup kitchen that got the carcasses from the Corpse in the Corvetee segment.
The one myth that really surprised me was getting shot under water (from the opening scene of Saving Private Ryan). These guys showed that as little as one foot of water will stop even the most high powered rifle. The bullet simply disintegrates.
Last night they showed that you CAN chop down a tree with a machine gun. Cool.
Love the show.
The chicken cannon is by far the best experiment they’ve ever done.
BFLR
Then I realized they do NOT do their home work before starting their show.
For example: In one show they busted a myth that fire dropping equipment could not have sucked up a scuba diver. If they just did a search on the net they would have found it was from So. California and the superscooper Bombardier 415 on a fire detail in Calabasas a few years back.
This is Superscoooper just about to fill its tanks.
They never even looked at this plane in their show as a possible source of what took place when the scuba diver was sucked up and spit out on he fire.
You mean the Navy training film about "synthetic snap-back" was total bravo sierra?
You will notice of course that “Mythbusters” has NEVER taken on the facts of Chuck Norris.
In the Hindenberg show, for example, they should have done a test with a dirigible (not a balloon) made of rubber cloth and filled with pure hydrogen. Pumping hydrogen into a burning dirigible full of air is hardly the same thing.
Further, they should have undertaken some effort to determine what would be required to trigger the thermite reaction. It's not meaningful to time how long it takes for the dirigible to burn all the way, if the dirigible burns slowly for most of the time and then most of the dirigible goes up quickly.
Also, on a different show, while I was impressed with their "paper machée crossbows", a spear gun would have been a much more effective and practical weapon. Is it plausible that a convict made a crossbow out of paper machée? No, it isn't. On the other hand, it is documented that a convict did build a spear gun out of paper machée. So what's the real "myth"?