“JimRob made the same choice”
He isn’t running for office that I know of, and he also didn’t start slinging it at others.
“If you honestly felt that, you’d stop posting on FR. But you don’t, you’re just a partisan trying to make a point.”
et tu, Brute? I wasn’t the one posting the same thing on every thread I could find of a candidate I opposed. I’ll leave FR at the time of my or JimRob’s choosing. Not yours.
“Try to remember that Free Republic is not a GOP website, it is a conservative website”
Which is why I post against Huckabee here, because HE IS NO CONSERVATIVE. He’s a nanny-stater with pro-gun and pro-life leanings. Heck, even Howard Dean was OK on guns. huckabee’s record and even some of his current rhetoric is appalling to those who value personal freedom. Nationwide cigarette ban, anyone?
“The time may soon come where many of us say, like Ronald Reagan’s famous quote regarding the Democrat party, “I didn’t leave the Republican party, the Republican party left me.”
May be true. I’m not all that thrilled with the GOP these days, either. They clearly don’t relish getting into the ring and mixing it up with the Dems. They scarcely even whimper when they’re getting beat like a rented mule.
As far as the rest of the front page statement, you don’t have to repeat it here for me, I’ve read it, too. I resent the implication that I don’t understand what this site is about.
He isn’t running for office that I know of, and he also didn’t start slinging it at others.
***JimRob still made the same choice to endorse Huckabee, Hunter hasn’t started slinging anything at others, and your post is non responsive.
Kevmo: “If you honestly felt that, you’d stop posting on FR. But you don’t, you’re just a partisan trying to make a point.”
Inviso: et tu, Brute?
***Do you even know what that term comes from? It means, “and you, Brutus?” and it comes from Julius Caesar when he realizes that his closest friend Brutus is among the assassins who took his life. Again that qualifies your post as nonresponsive. Mostly I’ve noticed that’s because RINOs don’t know conservatism, don’t know what FR is about, and try to coopt it for their own purposes.
I wasn’t the one posting the same thing on every thread I could find of a candidate I opposed. I’ll leave FR at the time of my or JimRob’s choosing. Not yours.
***Then you are a hypocrite. You give Hunter, the most conservative candidate, grief because he points out that Huckabee is the only social conservative remaining in the race, but you let JimRob take a pass and try your best to deflect the point. YOU ARE A RINO.
Kevmo: “Try to remember that Free Republic is not a GOP website, it is a conservative website”
Inviso: Which is why I post against Huckabee here, because HE IS NO CONSERVATIVE.
***None of the current RINOs is a conservative, so by posting against the only social conservative remaining, you show your true colors. FREE REPUBLIC is a SOCON website. Your attempt at redefining conservative is the sign of a RINO.
He’s a nanny-stater with pro-gun and pro-life leanings. Heck, even Howard Dean was OK on guns. huckabee’s record and even some of his current rhetoric is appalling to those who value personal freedom. Nationwide cigarette ban, anyone?
***Yes the Huckster aint all that conservative, he’s a pro-gun Pro-lifer with Nanny State leanings and that aint so great. But knocking down the only real conservative who was in the race because he endorses the only social conservative remaining is a sign that you are a RINO.
As far as the rest of the front page statement, you don’t have to repeat it here for me, I’ve read it, too. I resent the implication that I don’t understand what this site is about.
***OK, then I’ll wander off the implication zone and go into straight talk zone: You do not understand what this site is about. You have demonstrated it. You are a RINO. Spread your GOP garbage on some GOP website. Quit trying to redefine conservatism according to your definition.