Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RichardW

What you aren’t comprehending is that American *companies* (not software firms, but brick and mortar sell-you-a-car, make-your-pipe, mill-your-paper companies) have all written in-house software to run their businesses.

Vista can’t run most of that software, even though XP can.

These companies don’t go rewriting their in-house software every time a new OS comes out. That would cost *money* to deliver the same functionality, a very bad use of corporate resources.

Likewise, they aren’t going to replace all of their PC’s every 4 years. Heck, they’ve got to keep the old PC’s around just to run XP and their in-house software, now.

You are living in a different world. For you, it might just be one PC to swap out every 4 years...but to a company, it’s thousands of PC’s and thousands of employees who have to be trained and scores of system administrators who have to deal with the old, and new, and the networking interfacing of old and new PC’s and OS’s...which is to say, the less changed, the better the company runs (for less money and less downtime in swapping out machines, too).


42 posted on 02/03/2008 1:15:11 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Southack

Where we worked they changed out the computers every two or three years. If the software makers don’t want to update their software they deserve to go out of business anyway, just like the buggywhip manufacturers who didn’t move into the modern world. Four years for a PC is plenty of usage anyway. It is functionally obsolete.


47 posted on 02/04/2008 8:36:01 AM PST by RichardW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson