Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Vote Against McCain = A Hillary White House ZOT!

Posted on 01/20/2008 12:17:49 PM PST by kelly.s

As much as I prefer Rudy Giuliani for President, I just can't fathom voting against McCain and giving the White House to Hillary. Hopefully, most Republicans will see the lesser of two evils when casting their vote.

How 'bout a Giuliani/McCain ticket (or vice versa) for Pres. & VP? Think Independents would come on board?

I don't mean to sound like a desperate Republican, but sometimes you've just gotta call it like it is. :o)


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: anoldwhiteguyloses; sionnsar; zot; zotted
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-143 next last

1 posted on 01/20/2008 12:17:50 PM PST by kelly.s
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kelly.s
Giuliani/McCain ticket

That would REALLY motivate the base...not.

2 posted on 01/20/2008 12:19:44 PM PST by Rush4U
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kelly.s

This ought to be interesting.


3 posted on 01/20/2008 12:19:44 PM PST by andyandval
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kelly.s

Got asbestos?


4 posted on 01/20/2008 12:19:47 PM PST by Clara Lou (Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kelly.s

Normally I hold your view, but in the case of McCain v Hillary, I see both as damaging the country just about equally.


5 posted on 01/20/2008 12:20:11 PM PST by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kelly.s

I’d rather give my vote to Fred or Romney. Remaining true to the Conservative Ideals instead of selling out.


6 posted on 01/20/2008 12:20:29 PM PST by Cinnamon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kelly.s
As much as I prefer Rudy Giuliani for President,

Sounds like you might as well vote for Hillary. (Just telling it like it is)
7 posted on 01/20/2008 12:20:33 PM PST by cripplecreek (Duncan Hunter, Conservative excellence in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kelly.s

I had to wait until I was done throwing up.

I am not voting for ugly in the GOP anymore, ugly with no principle is not what I can stand.

Go Mitt.


8 posted on 01/20/2008 12:20:39 PM PST by dforest (Since principles no longer matter in the GOP, I am voting for the best looking!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kelly.s

And if Hillary loses to McCain, she can always run as a Republican next time.


9 posted on 01/20/2008 12:21:34 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kelly.s
McCain sucks!

I can't say it enough.

10 posted on 01/20/2008 12:21:51 PM PST by bmwcyle (McCain Sucks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kelly.s

You know, sometimes folks got to see how bad it gets beefore they know they even need a cure. Think Jimmuh “the dumb” Carter.

The lack of a national leader for conservatives for so long has been bad. In Florida I voted for the RINO, and all I got was this “stop global warming” tee shirt. Don’t need two.


11 posted on 01/20/2008 12:21:58 PM PST by Tarpon (Ignorance, the most expensive commodity produced by mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

lol. true... she’ll out-republican him by a mile next cycle.


12 posted on 01/20/2008 12:22:31 PM PST by Cinnamon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kelly.s

FRED THOMPSON is the best person to lead this country. He is a true conservative and has been his entire life. All one has to do is check his record to see this.

During my time in the Army as an Intelligence Analyst, I served under both Presidents Carter and Reagan (as my commanders in chief). Without argument, President Reagan was the best commander-in-chief a military person could ever have served under. Fred Thompson possesses the same qualities and vision as President Reagan in that he is strong on national defense and sees a dire need to secure our borders and control immigration.

I can think of no better person to lead this country and fix the problems we have. He is the only candidate from either party who has specific and detailed plans on border security and immigration reform; revitalization of America’s armed forces; saving and protecting Social Security; and tax relief and economic growth. These are detailed on his Web site at www.fred08.com . I challenge you to find any other candidate who has laid out specific plans to fix anything.

Fred Thompson has published his first principles, some of which are mentioned above. In addition to those, he strongly believes in individual liberty, personal responsibility, limited government, federalism, traditional American values, the rule of law and is a strong proponent of the Second Amendment — all concepts established during the birth of our country and documented in our Constitution.

Again, try to find any candidate who has laid out their plans to “fix” this country. You will find they all speak in vague and abstract terms on their plans.

For those who have heard Fred Thompson speak, you will usually hear him say that the Fred Thompson you see today is the same Fred Thompson you saw yesterday and is the same Fred Thompson you will see tomorrow. He stands by his principles and values and doesn’t shift his positions based on polls or public opinion; in other words, he doesn’t say what the voters want to hear just to get elected, but remains steadfast on his views and convictions.

During his time in the Senate he focused on three areas: to lower taxes, strengthen national security and expose waste in the federal government. Fred Thompson has foreign policy experience, having served as member of the Senate Foreign Relations and Senate Intelligence committees.

As chairman of the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee, he opened the investigation in 1997 on the Chinese government’s attempt to influence American policies and elections, and this investigation identified connections with the Clinton administration (documented in the committee’s report).

As a member of the Finance Committee, he worked tirelessly to enact three major tax-cut bills. Fred Thompson remains steadfast and even though a person may not agree with all his views and he understands some may disagree with him, you can count on him to be consistent and unwavering.

Don’t be fooled by his laid back approach and what critics call his “laziness.” As a former assistant U.S. attorney, he earned a reputation as a tough prosecutor and he possesses the toughness this country needs in order to tackle today’s and tomorrow’s issues.

I ask that you take a hard look at what this country needs, then take a hard look at all the other candidates’ views, policies, their records and their track record on consistency. Fred Thompson possesses integrity, loyalty, commitment, energy and decisiveness, all traits of an effective leader, and will emerge as the best person to take this country boldly forward.

Please help Fred win in 2008:
https://www.fred08.com/contribute.aspx?RefererID=c637caaa-315c-4b4c-9967-08d864cd0791


13 posted on 01/20/2008 12:23:23 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (Your "dirt" on Fred is about as persuasive as a Nancy Pelosi Veteran's Day Speech)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kelly.s

Romney will be a much, much more formidable opponent than McCain.

Seriously. He’s on a roll:

Romney has already won three times.
Romney is so far ahead in delagates, he’s got almost double his nearest competitor.
Romney is nice. People like him. And frankly, women find him attractive - and I’ve seen a number of (FR) women right here on these boards, saying they’ll vote for Romney, pretty much just for that reason.
He’s got strengths which play directly against democrats.

If hillary is the nominee - Romney makes strong inroads into hillary’s otherwise lock, on “soccer moms”.

If Osama-bama is the nominee - Osama-bama’s religious ambivalence is (way) more unsettling to voters, than Romney’s faith.

And Edwards just ain’t happening.

Way I see it, Romney wins the election.

January 21 2009: Mitt Romney takes office. And Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid, still won’t be able to do ... squat.


14 posted on 01/20/2008 12:23:40 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (So-called free trade advocates = "China Firsters")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kelly.s

8 more years of clintons in the white house? Is that what those who say they will stay home really want? You g uys really want a repeat of clinton scandals, higher taxes, soft on terrorists?


15 posted on 01/20/2008 12:25:15 PM PST by psjones (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kelly.s

“How ‘bout a Giuliani/McCain ticket (or vice versa) for Pres. & VP?”

What’s your DU screen name?


16 posted on 01/20/2008 12:25:45 PM PST by indcons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kelly.s
We can hamstring Hitlery, except for judicial nominees. and hopefully there wont be any from the SCOTUS

McCain will sell us down the river and get a lot "accomplished", mostly bad stuff; defacto amnesty, more CFR, global warming reg.,maybe gun control, "moderate" judges, and so on. No thanks, never. NEVER. Hes already shown his tue colors.

17 posted on 01/20/2008 12:25:51 PM PST by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umgud

I’ve come to a very similar conclusion. And if the nation is going to take a mind-numbing hit out of this next election, I’d rather the Dims get the ultimate blame for it.


18 posted on 01/20/2008 12:26:08 PM PST by willgolfforfood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rush4U
Yeah, but a Hillary candidacy might motivate the base to vote against her.
19 posted on 01/20/2008 12:26:25 PM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: psjones
Is that what those who say they will stay home really want?

She's a one termer. For sure.

20 posted on 01/20/2008 12:27:10 PM PST by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-143 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson