Skip to comments.
The Conservative Wing of Free Republic.
rb ver. 2.0 ^
| 01/11/08
| rb ver. 2.0
Posted on 01/11/2008 9:50:13 AM PST by Rb ver. 2.0
Sign in here. RINO's need not apply.
TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: conservatives
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 next last
To: Rb ver. 2.0
81
posted on
01/11/2008 1:20:08 PM PST
by
big'ol_freeper
(REAGAN: "..party..must represent certain fundamental beliefs [not] compromised..[for] expediency")
To: Rb ver. 2.0
Thompson/Hunter 08
Signing in.
Romney is not a conservative.
RomneyBots who think he is are delusional.
82
posted on
01/11/2008 1:27:28 PM PST
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain! True Supporters of Our Troops Support the Necessity of their Sacrifice!)
To: xzins
Thompson/Hunter I can picture neoliberals wailing and gnashing teeth over that combo. Strong, certain, intelligent, witty, confident, real, father-figure men. Anathema to a neoliberal.
83
posted on
01/11/2008 1:48:22 PM PST
by
polymuser
(Don't vote for Kennedy Wing of the GOP)
To: BubbaBasher
Sorry. I belong to the Ultra-Conservative wing of Free Republic!Infidel. I belong to the Uber-Conservative wing of Free Republic.
84
posted on
01/11/2008 1:49:50 PM PST
by
NeoCaveman
(It's a Texas Hold Em Primary and Fred is "All In" in South Carolina)
To: xzins
Same for the McCainiacs. The Hucksters remind me a lot of the Bushbots back in 1999 trying to convince us all that “compassionate” didn’t in fact mean “liberal”.
85
posted on
01/11/2008 1:50:53 PM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(What would a free man do?)
To: Dead Corpse
86
posted on
01/11/2008 1:51:26 PM PST
by
ovrtaxt
(In my fantasy world, the Dems run a Zell Miller/ Lieberman ticket...)
To: Dead Corpse
McCain is no conservative, not by any definition of the word that even Bill Clinton could conjure up.
87
posted on
01/11/2008 1:53:37 PM PST
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain! True Supporters of Our Troops Support the Necessity of their Sacrifice!)
To: polymuser
Who would be your #2 VP pick if Hunter weren’t available?
88
posted on
01/11/2008 1:54:35 PM PST
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain! True Supporters of Our Troops Support the Necessity of their Sacrifice!)
To: xzins
Who would be your #2 VP pick if Hunter weren’t available? Maybe Tom Tancredo. None of the other candidates.
89
posted on
01/11/2008 2:04:36 PM PST
by
polymuser
(Don't vote for Kennedy Wing of the GOP)
To: polymuser
I didn’t like Tancredo. He didn’t bring anything to the table. Hunter brings the possibility of California.
I like Petraeus and Bolton for reasons of “exciting the base.”
I think Santorum puts Pennsylvania in play.
90
posted on
01/11/2008 2:17:56 PM PST
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain! True Supporters of Our Troops Support the Necessity of their Sacrifice!)
To: Rb ver. 2.0
91
posted on
01/11/2008 2:41:31 PM PST
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: Rb ver. 2.0
Everybody’s more Liberal than me and thee, and I’m not too sure about thee! /joke
92
posted on
01/11/2008 3:02:04 PM PST
by
TexasRepublic
(Islam is a mental disorder)
To: polymuser
93
posted on
01/11/2008 3:53:56 PM PST
by
Virginia Ridgerunner
(“We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!” --Duncan Hunter)
To: Rb ver. 2.0
Please define conservative.
94
posted on
01/11/2008 4:08:30 PM PST
by
abigailsmybaby
(I was born with nothing. So far I have most of it left.)
To: Rb ver. 2.0
Cognito, ergo conservative.
95
posted on
01/11/2008 5:28:06 PM PST
by
NucSubs
(Rudy Giuliani 2008! Our liberal democrat is better than theirs!)
To: Rb ver. 2.0
96
posted on
01/11/2008 5:29:58 PM PST
by
BIGLOOK
(Keelhaul politicians. The Ship of State needs a good scrubbing!)
To: Rb ver. 2.0
To: Constitution Day
Wouldn’t “CINO” be more appropriate?
***Yes.
And if FR has no affiliation with any party, why presume to claim what a Republican is and is not (RINO)?
***True, it is presumptuous. Is it equally presumptuous for republicans to come onto this website when they don’t agree with JimRob’s definition and try to change it?
All valid questions, I think...don’t you?
***Yes, thanks for at least thinking through this rather than generating kneejerk reactions.
98
posted on
01/11/2008 5:41:07 PM PST
by
Kevmo
(Duncan Hunter won't "let some arrogant corporate media executive decide whether this campaign's over)
To: NeoCaveman; BubbaBasher
bubbabasher: Sorry. I belong to the Ultra-Conservative wing of Free Republic!
NeoCaveman: Infidel. I belong to the Uber-Conservative wing of Free Republic.
***Infidel. I belong to the Super Duper Uber-Conservative wing of Free Republic.
99
posted on
01/11/2008 5:43:42 PM PST
by
Kevmo
(Duncan Hunter won't "let some arrogant corporate media executive decide whether this campaign's over)
To: Rb ver. 2.0
Does this group include any Paultards? I really don’t want to associate with them.
100
posted on
01/11/2008 5:44:08 PM PST
by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson