Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Swordmaker

This is a symptom of the approach used for SDLC, Software Development Life Cycle.

When old software is upgraded or new stuff developed, it is done on the latest and greatest OS and registry structures. Few vendors strive to guarantee that nothing will become obsolete.

I won’t say that Big Blue is an exception, but I will say that Big Blue is way, way, way better than most.


14 posted on 01/07/2008 1:38:26 AM PST by djf (...and dying in your bed, many years from now, did you donate to FR?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: djf
I won’t say that Big Blue is an exception, but I will say that Big Blue is way, way, way better than most.

One of the big reasons that IBM had to make their systems backward compatible was that their Customers banded together and demanded it. The S/360 was the start of that; most previous hardware changes made a lot of the system programming obsolete, and Blue's Customers realised that they needed a way to help themselves and pressure Blue to "Do the right thing!©" The Users Group SHARE had a big hand in that.


35 posted on 01/07/2008 7:49:35 AM PST by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson