Posted on 01/01/2008 6:26:03 AM PST by barryg
Edited on 01/01/2008 6:31:30 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
You are at 50-50.
I am 80-20. 80 percent zoo/accrediting organization and 20 percent boys IF it can be proven they were taunting the tiger.
But my position is that if I am taking my family to the zoo, I want the tiger locked up even if there are boys taunting it.
Keep the tiger away from my family. No excuses. Period.
The substantial evidence is a dead body, which disproves your theory.
You probably think to O-Rings from the space shuttle Challenger were adequate, don't you? You know, they worked MOST of the time!
If you look at the zoo map there are a good number of animal enclosures of varying depths WITH NO ROOFS.
However, if I were on a jury hearing this case, and the facts turned out to be as I described, I would assign equal blame. Because of their own deliberate part in this, I don't believe they deserve to become rich as a result of it.
Yup. I knew they *had* to assault the tiger to get it to track them for 300-plus-yards.
Teasing is much better.
On the other hand, even if the tiger was teased, she shouldn't have been able to leap out of the enclosure.
Now if she spoke English that would be a whole 'nuther matter!
Not at all. When you have to use cattle prods, whips, or slingshots to motivate the animal to perform the amazing feat, then the 67 years of containment shows the confinment was adequate.
"You probably think to O-Rings from the space shuttle Challenger were adequate, don't you?"
No. They were not adequate.
The shoe in question didn’t belong to any of these guys. It was quite possibly from a previously EATEN visitor, the tiger having forgotten to dispose of all the evidence!
You don't think that the trail of fresh blood has something to do with it?
It is even possible that the tiger planted the slingshots to make the boys look bad.
Of course the odor from the dempsy dumpster in back of the Cafe may well have attracted the tiger in the first place.
If the guys tried to sue and I were on the jury, they would get nothing.
The fact that the tiger got out clearly means the enclosure was NOT adequate.
Particularly an English speaking tiger who could understand she was being taunted ~ such a tiger could do most anything.
Your star witness has already admitted that the wall was inadequate:
_________________________________________
Zoo Director Says Tiger Wall Was Low
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - The director of the zoo where a teenager was killed by an escaped tiger acknowledged Thursday that the wall around the animal’s pen was just 12 1/2 feet high - well below the height recommended by the accrediting agency for the nation’s zoos.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1945139/posts
Main Entry: 2taunt
Function: transitive verb
Etymology: perhaps from Middle French tenter to try, tempt more at tempt
Date: 1539
: to reproach or challenge in a mocking or insulting manner : jeer at
I'm sure the tiger took the provoking acts and gestures as torments. Teasing implies pettiness, or a playfulness that obfuscates the fundamental essence of these acts as torments.
"even if the tiger was teased, she shouldn't have been able to leap out of the enclosure."
The motivation to leap out of the cage was caused by the tormenting with the slingshots, not the wall height.
No. If it was blood and good eating the tiger was after, she had a kill already. The tiger was out to get the rest of the punks that hurt her. The blood trail was only a trail to where they could be found.
They are not cooperating with police because they know their actions that night will effect their ability to get a big settlement.
I don't consider the zoo director a witness. I said the wall was adequate for 67 years. I also said before that I considered the wall was too low to guarantee the tiger wouldn't get out. The fact that it took the tormenting with slingshots to get that tiger to jump out of that pit means the pit depth was adequate and the zoo's treatment of the animals had been good all along.
The abandoned shoe from an earlier event suggests this was a smart tiger who knew exactly what to do and had done it before.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.