I don't consider the zoo director a witness. I said the wall was adequate for 67 years. I also said before that I considered the wall was too low to guarantee the tiger wouldn't get out. The fact that it took the tormenting with slingshots to get that tiger to jump out of that pit means the pit depth was adequate and the zoo's treatment of the animals had been good all along.
If you were the director for the zoo, I can guarantee the boys would double their cash settlement.
Only a fool would claim that the tiger enclosure was adequate when it clearly was not.
If the zoo was convinced that the enclosure was adequate, they would not be adding reinforcements to bring it up to current standards.
Please provide the statements from all the experts who now claims that the wall was adequate.