Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

16-Year-Old Jamie Lynn Spears (Britney's Sister)Is Pregnant
TMZ ^ | Posted Dec 18th 2007 7:17PM by TMZ Staff

Posted on 12/18/2007 5:01:02 PM PST by Perdogg

Jamie Lynn Spears, 16, has confirmed to OK! Magazine that she is pregnant. Oh. My. God.

A source tells us the interview, which hits stands tomorrow, is six pages and is on the record with Jamie Lynn and her mother. She tells the mag that the father is Casey Aldridge, who she has been dating for some time and first met at church. Brit's younger sister, star of Nick's "Zoey 101," says she's keeping the baby.

(Excerpt) Read more at tmz.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Music/Entertainment
KEYWORDS: corruptingaminor; culturalentropy; culturalmalaise; culturewar; hollywoodbastards; nickelodeon; oopsididitagain; sexpositiveagenda; societaldeathspiral; statutoryrape; teensex; viacommies; waltsrotatingcorpse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 next last
To: rintense

They have time on their hands?


101 posted on 12/19/2007 6:43:52 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: coop71
Why on earth would I have a child in my 20’s (or teens!!!) when I wasn’t ready, I wasn’t married, and I was enjoying my life on my own?

You're missing the point - human females are biologically designed to reproduce at 16, because everyone used to die at 30. It isn't about what women choose to do today when they routinely live to be 90.

Jaime Lynn Spears is just unintentionally doing what she is biologically programmed to do. The point was that people shouldn't react with such horror to the concept of "pregnant at 16"...it's just human nature and not at all too soon in a biological sense.

102 posted on 12/19/2007 6:48:39 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves ("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

You can take the trailer-trash out of the trailer park...


103 posted on 12/19/2007 6:57:19 AM PST by RockinRight (Fred Thompson spells gravitas B-A-L-L-S-O-F-S-T-E-E-L.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

The book is on hold. Guess there’s a new chapter to be written. Betcha the ratings for Jamie’s show go up, however, but her role is going to have to be re-cast.


104 posted on 12/19/2007 7:00:36 AM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: rintense

Giving money to trailer trash doesn’t make them no longer trailer trash.

Now, they’re just trash living in a big house.


105 posted on 12/19/2007 7:01:02 AM PST by RockinRight (Fred Thompson spells gravitas B-A-L-L-S-O-F-S-T-E-E-L.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

I’m completely with you on the biology part. I take exception to the “professional woman” waiting until 40 to have a kid. My point was, so what? Have a kid when you’re ready and if you’re ready at 40, go for it.


106 posted on 12/19/2007 7:15:26 AM PST by coop71 (Being a redhead means never having to say you're sorry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
Just because science has proven that men are biologically programmed to not be monogamous doesn't mean its right. Morality (and common sense) is what separates us from the apes, who unlike humans, can not control what they are biologically supposed to do.

If we use biology as a justification for everything, then what's the point of morals? To me, justifying behavior because of biology is a liberal way of explaining everything.

107 posted on 12/19/2007 7:16:58 AM PST by rintense (Thompson/Hunter 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
>You can take the trailer-trash out of the trailer park...

Do you think the guy
took her out, or just did her
on the trailer's couch?
108 posted on 12/19/2007 7:18:26 AM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: rintense
I agree 100% (having said that of course, I hope I don't fall into the same situation with my 17 year old son - even though we have spoken with him) especially this part....

Fred did the honorable and right thing back then.

109 posted on 12/19/2007 7:19:21 AM PST by codercpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

Comment #110 Removed by Moderator

To: Mr. Jeeves
because everyone used to die at 30

Wrong.

There was never a time in human history when the average person died at 30.

That's a myth based on bad math.

111 posted on 12/19/2007 7:22:35 AM PST by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

Comment #112 Removed by Moderator

Comment #113 Removed by Moderator

Comment #114 Removed by Moderator

Comment #115 Removed by Moderator

To: Morgana
Actually YES to about 200 years ago!

No, that was never the case.

The reason why dimwits believe that the average person lived to be 30 is because they don't understand statistics.

Of 100 people born in 1725, say, 30 of them would die either at birth or before age 3 of childhood diseases.

Of the remaining 70, 10 would die of disease, accidents or violence at relatively young ages.

The remaining 60 or so would live until their mid-60s.

In other words, if you were born in 1725, survived childhood, and then kept out of trouble as an adult you would normally live to be 65-70 years old.

If you average this out numerically, you get an average lifespan of 30-40 years - but in the 1700s people didn't expect to die at age 30.n If they made it to adulthood they expected to live into their 60s, and they did.

The average funeral in the 1700s wasn't held for a 30 year old, but for 1 year olds and 60-something year olds.

116 posted on 12/19/2007 7:36:28 AM PST by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
See post 116.

Plenty of Joseph and Mary's contemporaries lived to be 70 or older.

And we have no idea exactly how old Mary or Joseph were.

117 posted on 12/19/2007 7:38:20 AM PST by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

One of my many problems with this is that Ms. Spears has a show on Disney Channel with a pre-teen audience, including my young daughters.

What the heck kind of role model is she?


118 posted on 12/19/2007 7:43:19 AM PST by ReluctantDragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: ForbesFan

Plenty of money isn’t helping Brit’s kids much, is it?


119 posted on 12/19/2007 8:02:31 AM PST by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

At least Britney’s kids will have cousins to play with...and someday marry.


120 posted on 12/19/2007 8:04:34 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson