To: dynachrome
Hey, according to Mitt's most famous statements on the whole issue of weapons, you'd think the second amendment was all about hunting, anyway...and so why would ya need an assault weapon for hunting?
7 posted on
12/17/2007 4:11:27 PM PST by
Colofornian
(Tell me again why you want to vote for a future god?)
To: Colofornian
“why would ya need an assault weapon for hunting?’
Them there prairie dogs can be pretty vicious!
8 posted on
12/17/2007 4:14:49 PM PST by
dynachrome
(Immigration without assimilation means the death of this nation~Captainpaintball)
To: Mitt Romney
The 2nd Amendment isnt about Hunting? Mitt ... who in the hell told you the 2nd Amendment is about hunting? Is the Constitution about sports? Is the bill or rights about fishing, bowling, polo and hunting?
Screw you Mitt ... I hope FRed kicks your sorry gun grabbing RINO @$$.
11 posted on
12/17/2007 5:16:48 PM PST by
GregoTX
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
To: Colofornian
Well, ironically, a lot of the weapons they improperly call “assault” weapons can be used for hunting, so they’re still in contradiction.
18 posted on
12/18/2007 10:18:20 AM PST by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson