Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SeaHawkFan

He never had possession, and clearly showed juggling in the replay, but when the outcome is “necessary”, the play “stands as called” using the “no indisputable evidence to reverse” excuse.


32 posted on 12/07/2007 2:41:43 PM PST by traditional1 (Thompson/Hunter '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: traditional1

You don’t have to convince me.


35 posted on 12/07/2007 2:44:20 PM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: traditional1

You are FOS with your conspiracy theories...


36 posted on 12/07/2007 2:44:40 PM PST by misterrob (Twelve down, Seven more til the Pats win the SB again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: traditional1

Of course the outcome wasn’t “necessary” thanks to the idiot Ravens taking idiot penalties (and deserved too). Had the call been reversed the Pats would have had the ball at the 2 with 44 seconds and a TO, the Ravens weren’t going to stop them.

Face reality, the Ravens screwed the pooch, they couldn’t finish the deal then they had a major meltdown on the Pats final possession and gave the game away. If you insist there’s a conspiracy check out Billick’s account because the problems came from that sideline not the zebras.


41 posted on 12/07/2007 3:00:03 PM PST by discostu (a mountain is something you don't want to %^&* with)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson