Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Apple’s rising popularity lures hackers
Financial Times ^ | Dec 5, 2007 | Kevin Allison

Posted on 12/06/2007 9:59:43 AM PST by driftdiver

After years of relative safety, the Apple Mac is becoming an increasingly tempting target for malicious computer hackers, according to a new report published this week.

Security researchers have been aware of the threat to Apple since last year, when they detected the first piece of malicious code – or “malware” – specifically designed to target Apple.

Over the past few months, however, the number of malicious programmes has increased, according to a report published this week by F-Secure, an internet security company.

“Over the past two years, we had found one or two pieces of malware targeting Macs,” said Patrik Runald, an F-Secure security researcher. “Since October, we’ve found 100-150 variants.”

(Excerpt) Read more at ft.com ...


TOPICS: Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: apple; hacker; microsoft
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-142 next last
To: driftdiver

“Unix is harder to hack but is not unhackable.”

I know.

“Toss in a unsophisticated user and its not all that difficult.”

But isn’t that the major selling point for Apple. You don’t have to know much, just plug it in and use it?

I don’t really have a dog in this fight. I just don’t care for zealots on either side of this. Micro$ofties, and Apple zealots are both a bit much for me to take.


21 posted on 12/06/2007 10:16:54 AM PST by brownsfan (America has "jumped the shark")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

I’m of the mind that in previous times, that some viruses/hacks were made by Apple users who didn’t want to pee in their own swimming pool but that the converse was not so true.

Now we have third world hackers who like to mess with everyone.


22 posted on 12/06/2007 10:18:09 AM PST by weegee (End the Bush-Bush-Bush-Clinton/Clinton-Clinton/Clinton-Bush-Bush-Clinton/Clinton Oligarchy 1980-2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

“Hyperlinks and attachments containing malicious code will not just “install” without further authorization from the computer user prompted by the operating system, unlike a Windows PC.”

Perhaps, my company was tasked to write some security code for MACs. I hate MACs but may have to build that side of the business up. Its obvious there is going to be a good opportunity to make money with disillusioned mac users.


23 posted on 12/06/2007 10:18:17 AM PST by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Still not a threat. The very architecture of UNIX makes it impossible for malware to run without user permission being granted.

"Impossible" is a very big word -- and a serious lure to hackers.

There are certainly ways to get around the issue -- for example, by cleverly hacking into or mimicking software that does have permission to run.

The point being -- you'll be saying "impossible" until your machine gets eaten.

24 posted on 12/06/2007 10:18:21 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

Javahacks exist too. You can load a page and not click anything ON that page and still be infected.

It even happens on a site like Myspace (now that the Newscorp owns it) where you are viewing a known friend’s page that contains some hacked content.


25 posted on 12/06/2007 10:19:50 AM PST by weegee (End the Bush-Bush-Bush-Clinton/Clinton-Clinton/Clinton-Bush-Bush-Clinton/Clinton Oligarchy 1980-2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
I hate MACs

That's nice. I tolerate PC's.

26 posted on 12/06/2007 10:20:28 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
Unlike the Windows PC, no malware exists that can take over a Mac, without the owner authorizing it. Nor will it exist, due to the fundamental nature of the underlying UNIX architecture of the OSX operating system.

No German would dare to invade France! The Maginot Line is impregnable!

27 posted on 12/06/2007 10:21:40 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan

“I don’t really have a dog in this fight. I just don’t care for zealots on either side of this. Micro$ofties, and Apple zealots are both a bit much for me to take.”

I hate the gorilla that is MS but they are extremely successful and a model for capitalism. We would not have the modern computer age without Microsoft. So thank you Bill.

Apple makes pretty products that work pretty well among themselves. Interoperability is a challenge and managing an enterprise full of MACs would be a challenge. I find their snooty, liberal minded Ads to be offensive and the main reason I don’t like MAC.


28 posted on 12/06/2007 10:21:48 AM PST by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

29 posted on 12/06/2007 10:22:38 AM PST by Andy from Beaverton (I'm so anti-pc, I use a Mac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
This is gonna be fun to watch as long as you don’t own a mac.

Why so you can enjoy your thousands of IN THE WILD exploits on your wintel machine? lol

30 posted on 12/06/2007 10:22:45 AM PST by SengirV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
No German would dare to invade France!

Interesting analogy, coming from an apparent resident of the Sudetenland.

31 posted on 12/06/2007 10:23:06 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

“I hate MACs

That’s nice. I tolerate PC’s.”

Same here but they pay the bills. Someday I’ll have a sailboat without a PC in sight.


32 posted on 12/06/2007 10:23:18 AM PST by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000; brownsfan

I don’t know anyone who owns one but ... has anyone ever run a port scan against a Mac ?

I’d be interested to know the results.


33 posted on 12/06/2007 10:23:26 AM PST by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
I also said last time it was because very few hackers were focused on apple.

It may be a factor of geography. There are not so many Macs in Russia and China where many of the most successful hackers are based. But in the U.S., where Macs are widely available, there are plenty of hackers who have tried and failed in their efforts.

34 posted on 12/06/2007 10:23:50 AM PST by HAL9000 (Fred Thompson/Mike Huckabee 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SengirV

“Why so you can enjoy your thousands of IN THE WILD exploits on your wintel machine? lol”

I think its more in the millions. However I’m going on about 5 years without a problem. Standard security policies work well. Pretending you’re unhackable will fail eventually.


35 posted on 12/06/2007 10:25:08 AM PST by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
Colorado is the Sudetenland? Lordy, I must have been asleep for 20 years!

You understand of course, that I was poking at your claims that UNIX is inherently impregnable. NOTHING is inherently impregnable.

The Germans simply went around the Maginot Line, rather than through it. Are you suggesting there's absolutely no way around UNIX protections?

36 posted on 12/06/2007 10:27:11 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: cinives
I don’t know anyone who owns one but ... has anyone ever run a port scan against a Mac ?

All Macs include an application call "Network Utility". It has a port scan feature with a nice user interface.


37 posted on 12/06/2007 10:27:13 AM PST by HAL9000 (Fred Thompson/Mike Huckabee 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Of course an Apple can be hacked.

The problem is that the OpenBSD its built on, along with Apple's own security on top of it, makes it a tough nut to crack. Think an order of magnitude more difficult resulting in many fewer successes on the part of hackers.

Since the modern hacker is after computing platforms used to send out spam and launch DDoS attacks, why should they spend the effort on Apple computers when with the same effort (e.g. - manhours) spent trying to root an Apple machine they can successfully take over a dozen easy-pickings Windows products? Follow the money...

38 posted on 12/06/2007 10:27:52 AM PST by chilepepper (The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: basil
Who on earth would download software that they know nothing about?

A large segment of Apple's target market over the years have been teachers, academics, and artsy people, who we all know are overwhelmingly liberal. We also know that liberals as a group are not exactly the brightest bulb in the the chandallier or the sharpest knife in the drawer, and they are often a couple fries short of a happy meal. Need I say more?

39 posted on 12/06/2007 10:34:09 AM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cinives

I’m running the port scan on my Mac. So far, I see only three open in-bound ports. Two of them are for printer sharing, and one is for the netinfo system.


40 posted on 12/06/2007 10:35:23 AM PST by HAL9000 (Fred Thompson/Mike Huckabee 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-142 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson