Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
It's easy to defend the current system because even with its enormous flaws it's a huge improvement over the "old" one.

Exactly right. Great post. The BCS is designed to eliminate the scenario where the #1 and #2 (in rankings) teams are locked in to different bowls because of automatic conference tie-ins. That's the promise the BCS gave us, and it has given us that game when conditions permitted.

When there is no clear #1 and #2, the system breaks down. It wasn't designed for that. Be happy with what you have and don't keep dreaming about a 16 or 8 team tournament that is never going to happen.

At the very best, we may one day soon see the New Year's Bowls, on a rotating basis, serve as national semifinals.

And that's as far as it needs to go.

90 posted on 12/03/2007 1:13:55 PM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: SoothingDave
Thanks -- I think this point you made sums it up perfectly!

The BCS is designed to eliminate the scenario where the #1 and #2 (in rankings) teams are locked in to different bowls because of automatic conference tie-ins. That's the promise the BCS gave us, and it has given us that game when conditions permitted.

91 posted on 12/03/2007 1:17:52 PM PST by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson