Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: onja
I looked at this list and it's rather bogus. Here's an excerpt from the US News' Ranking Formula:
the second step determined whether the school's least-advantaged students (black, Hispanic, and low-income) were performing better than average for similar students in the state. We compared each school's math and reading proficiency rates for disadvantaged students with the statewide results for these disadvantaged student groups and then selected schools that were performing better than this state average.

Schools that made it through those first two steps became eligible to be judged nationally on the final step: college-readiness ...

So if you locale doesn't have any "disadvantaged" students your local school is disqualified from being "judged nationally." How absurd!

ML/NJ

3 posted on 12/01/2007 5:41:05 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ml/nj

Yeah, that’s why I gave my statements a qualifying remark. Just like political polls, these sort of surveys are always open to doubt.

Of course, the Catalina Foothills High School mentioned is extremely rich and mostly white. Very few disadvantaged kids, if I recall correctly. And even University High School is quite rich and has almost no blacks and few Hispanics (mostly White, Asian).


4 posted on 12/01/2007 6:26:21 AM PST by onja ("The government of England is a limited mockery.") (France is a complete mockery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson