To: Zakeet
They tested a beta service pack. Vista is much more secure than Windows XP. Its so new hackers have yet to write malware for it.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
8 posted on
11/27/2007 1:59:14 PM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
Its so new hackers have yet to write malware for it. Funny that, because they are beginning to hit my bench with viruses on board... I guess it could just be backward compatibility... no, wait... can't be that... it's Vista :P
18 posted on
11/27/2007 2:03:08 PM PST by
roamer_1
(Vote for Frudy McRomsonbee -Turn red states purple in 08!)
To: goldstategop
Vista is much more secure than Windows XP That's because nobody can use it................
19 posted on
11/27/2007 2:03:59 PM PST by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
To: goldstategop
They tested a beta service pack. Vista is much more secure than Windows XP. Its so new hackers have yet to write malware for it.
Security by obscurity....
31 posted on
11/27/2007 2:09:25 PM PST by
Nat Turner
(Proud two term solider in the 2nd Infantry Div 84-85; 91-92)
To: goldstategop
Let the hackers devote their time to hacking Vista. I think xp is just fine and have no intentions of upgrading.
My big concern is that the number of applications that no longer work with Vista. Also I hear of printer drivers etc that no longer work.
Installing Vista probably means less performance overall, plus none of the printer fax scan peripherals are guaranteed to continue working.
Just say no to Vista.
55 posted on
11/27/2007 2:28:17 PM PST by
o_zarkman44
(No Bull in 08!)
To: goldstategop
“Yet” being the operative word.
86 posted on
11/27/2007 2:57:42 PM PST by
Coronal
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson