1 posted on
11/17/2007 10:13:50 AM PST by
BenLurkin
To: KevinDavis
2 posted on
11/17/2007 10:14:17 AM PST by
BenLurkin
To: markman46; AntiKev; wastedyears; ALOHA RONNIE; RightWhale; anymouse; Brett66; SunkenCiv; ...
3 posted on
11/17/2007 10:16:57 AM PST by
KevinDavis
(Mitt Romney 08)
To: BenLurkin
Thanks for post.
from the article..
When combined with liquid oxygen, a liquid methane engine offers higher performance relative to other storable propellants, better long-term storage potential relative to liquid hydrogen, and lower cost handling characteristics due to its environmentally safe nature, project officials said.
.....to save time.
4 posted on
11/17/2007 10:30:04 AM PST by
skinkinthegrass
(just b/c your paranoid, doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you....Run, Fred, Run. :^)
To: BenLurkin
We need better propulsion systems.
5 posted on
11/17/2007 10:31:02 AM PST by
wastedyears
(One Marine vs. 550 consultants. Sounds like good odds to me.)
To: BenLurkin
Alliant said it has completed testing of a 7,500-pound-force thrust liquid oxygen-methane workhorse engine. The test series provided valuable insights into LOX-methane engine ignition, startup, shutdown, nominal operation, off-nominal operation and dynamic combustion stability, according to the company.
Nice, an engine for in-space startup without the liquid hydrogen handling issues.
11 posted on
11/17/2007 1:20:02 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(Profile updated Thursday, November 15, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson