Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

We need better propulsion systems.


5 posted on 11/17/2007 10:31:02 AM PST by wastedyears (One Marine vs. 550 consultants. Sounds like good odds to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: wastedyears

It’s great to say that. But that’s the same sort of statement as saying “We need better politicians.” It gives no possible solutions, nor does it give value to the difficulty of what it proposes.

We have a better propulsion system that is available near-term. The Gas Core Nuclear Rocket (one type of which is the Nuclear Lightbulb) can in principle create very high specific impulses at very high thrust levels. But let’s see if the vocal environmental lobby would ever let this happen.

We need to expand into space as a society in order to survive. As to the topic at hand, this engine was developed for the original ESAS-specified Orion crew vehicle. The Orion crew vehicle was to have “Mars-forward” technologies such as methane propulsion. But in his infinite wisdom Mike “Shafter” Griffin has decided that hypergolics are better. He’s wrong.

I hope XCOR succeeds in developing this engine further and getting it on the business end of the CEV.


7 posted on 11/17/2007 10:38:26 AM PST by AntiKev ("No damage. The world's still turning isn't it?" - Stereo Goes Stellar - Blow Me A Holloway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson