Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ripley

At least I didn’t write an entire book without the vaguest understanding of the theory I was attacking, as Corsi did.

He apparently actually believes that biotic oil means people believing oil comes from “dinosaurs” rather than marine and lacustrine plankton and diatoms. I have a suspicion he doesn’t know what a diatom is.

I’m awaiting his book about abiotic coal.


19 posted on 11/14/2007 4:00:55 AM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Strategerist

All modern western abiotic oil theories have their genesis in the Soviet Union.

http://www.questionsquestions.net/docs04/peakoil1.html

The fact is that the chemistry is well describable. Another fact is that no matter how much carbon and hydrogen and oxygen we see on the surface of the Earth, it is miserably less than that in the interior, probably billionths.

My personal opinion is that we will in time find out both sides are correct. After all, it is not unusual at all to see complex hydrocarbons in the atmospheres of our outer planets, and last time I checked, nobody is claiming there are any dinosaurs there.


25 posted on 11/14/2007 4:39:22 AM PST by djf (Send Fred some bread! Not a whole loaf, a slice or two will do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson