Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Miltie
Zocor has my bad cholesterol down from 187 to 95. I’ll stick with it, thanks.

And if you get it down to zero, you'll die. Think about it. I take the stuff too, but I'm not at all convinced that there is any correlation between cholesterol levels and incidence of heart attack. Google cholesterol+heart+attack+correlation and you will see that there is considerable debate about this, and remember that only one side of the debate has a financial interest. This doesn't make them wrong. I'm just observing.

ML/NJ

41 posted on 10/18/2007 11:38:39 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: ml/nj
And if you get it down to zero, you'll die. Think about it. I take the stuff too, but I'm not at all convinced that there is any correlation between cholesterol levels and incidence of heart attack

You're absolutely right. Cholesterol is only an indicator of other, as of yet undiscovered, factors involved with heart disease. Lowering cholesterol in an effort to reduce heart disease is like sucking the mercury out of a thermometer to make the temperature go down.

Lower cholesterol, by itself, does not reduce the risk of heart attack.

50 posted on 10/18/2007 11:41:59 AM PDT by TChris (Cartels (oil, diamonds, labor) are bad. Free-market competition is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: ml/nj

You might be interested in this:

http://www.second-opinions.co.uk/cholesterol_myth_2.html


102 posted on 10/18/2007 12:09:07 PM PDT by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson