Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LIConFem

Yeah, I don’t see breach of contract frivolous at all, if that’s what happened here.


10 posted on 10/16/2007 9:31:00 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: 1rudeboy

I’m not sure how you “breach” a contract if there was never a contract.

I can’t imagine anybody paying $27,000 for flowers that will be dead in a weak. That would have paid for a couple of years of the Frost’s insurance premiums.

But if the flowers really were substandard, and they have pictures, I would expect a refund would be in order.

Without a contract, I can’t see how the bride could do ANY better than to obtain part of her payment back, based on some judge’s decision as to how much the flowers which WERE provided were reasonably worth relative to how much they would be worth if they had not been flawed.

I could hear Judge Wampner awarding the bride the $4000 she apparently asked for originally, if the flowers were really wilted.


16 posted on 10/16/2007 9:36:54 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson