Anna Nicole Smith, Seeking Justice #4

[nature]

Morning sod!

I am so far behind. I went offline and then fell asleep very early last night. In slow motion the last few days.

Oh, I know the snoops are out. If not stealing someone else’s research, they are looking for howie is my thought.

ET totally did the site over and dumbed tons of videos and articles about the case! One way to cheat IF any cache copy is left is if you have part of the article. If you put part of the sentence in google and hit search, it sometimes brings up a cached paged. you have to click on the “cached” link not the head link to get it though. Sometimes that will at least give you a board or blog that has it too. Better than nothing .

[nature]

not Rte but here is some Shebby info

http://www.merchantcircle.com/business/Law.Offices.of.David.P.Shebby.310-821-4445

http://www.etonline.com/news/38764/index.html

Former law partner Dave Shebby says Stern led a “frugal” life, driving a 20-year-old Jaguar.
Shebby says he and Stern had to end their brief partnership because Stern wasn’t bringing in any income.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/artsentertainment/2003604191_hstern07.html

David Granoff Public Relations Counter Defendant 09/18/2003
David Granoff Public Relations Counter Defendant 01/22/2003
David Granoff Public Relations Plaintiff 10/28/2002
Shebby & Stern Defendant 10/28/2002
Anna Nicole Smith Counter Claimant 09/18/2003
Anna Nicole Smith Defendant 10/28/2002
Anna Nicole Smith Counter Claimant 01/22/2003
Howard K. Stern Defendant 10/28/2002

1:02-cv-08620-RMB-KNF David Granoff P.R. v. Smith, et al
Richard M. Berman, presiding
Kevin Nathaniel Fox, referral
Date filed: 10/28/2002
Date terminated: 12/12/2003 Date of last filing: 02/13/2004

Defendant: Howard K. Stern
Defendant: Shebby & Stern
Counter Claimant: Anna Nicole Smith represented by David B. Wolf Phone: (212)974-7474

[sodpoodle]

What kind of ethical attorney practice would have condoned the improper atty/client relationship that HK$ fostered with Anna?

Certainly the various attorneys (like Boesch) would or should have known about it and stopped it.

Unless Howard, the “capable resource”, was given the assignment to *control* Anna for the sake of the billion dollar *investment*.

Just pondering;)

Great list BTW!

[sodpoodle]

From the Seattle Times article:

Birkhead testified that he and Smith had a falling-out in May 2006 when he didn’t obey her request to buy her a pair of sunglasses. She yelled at him, and that was the last time he saw her. Shortly after that, he says, the model moved to the Bahamas.

That seems to settle the question of whether Birkhead saw Anna in January ‘07 - *he last saw her in May 2006*

[sodpoodle]

Are you in CA?

That thread is inspirational and a great reminder how our fellow Americans handle adversity;

Faith, strength and service.

[nature]

One that wants to win a case, thinks they have a good case, and keeps his nose out of his clients private life. Can’t fight city hall attitude and .. lets face it, gets a free flunky to help with research and controls the client.

[nature]

Did I include this..

http://shoplocal.planetdiscover.com/sp?aff=1&catId=11180211&address=Long%20Beach,%20NY&maxDistance=

Shebby & Stern Phone: 310-821-4445
Map Address:
330 Washington Blvd
Marina Del Rey, CA 90292 Categories: Civil Attorneys
Shebby David Attorney At Law Phone: 310-821-4445
Map Address:
330 Washington Blvd Ste 609
Marina Del Rey, CA 90292 Categories: Civil Attorneys
Law Offices of David P Shebby Phone: 310-821-4445
Map Address:
330 Washington Blvd Ste 609
Marina Del Rey, CA 90292 Categories: Civil Attorneys

[nature]

Someone else didn’t like to pay their bills :D

CLOSED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Western Division - Los Angeles)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:98-cv-04091-URC

USA v. Ronald A. Rale
Assigned to: Judge CVRecovery Case CRStatistics Unassigned
Demand: $24,000
Cause: 20:1080 Student Loan Recovery
Date Filed: 05/26/1998
Date Terminated: 09/21/1998
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 152 Contract: Recovery Student Loan
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Plaintiff
United States of America represented by Martin Brachfeld
Martin Brachfeld Law Offices
962 Westcreek Ln, Ste 135
Westlake Village, CA 91362
818-654-2590
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Michael J Yamaguchi
Martin Brachfeld Law Offices
962 Westcreek Ln, Ste 135
Westlake Village, CA 91362
818-654-2590
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V.
Defendant
Ronald A Rale

Date Filed # Docket Text
05/26/1998 1 COMPLAINT ON PROMISSORY NOTE filed ( Dept of Education ). Summons issd (jp) Modified on 06/01/1998 (Entered: 06/01/1998)
06/11/1998 2 RETURN OF ORIGINAL SUMMONS and proof of service of summons & complaint served upon Ronald A. Rale by subst svc on Rita Rale, mother & co-occupant, on 6/7/98, and by 1st class mail on 6/8/98, w/ decl of reasonable diligence. (gk) (Entered: 06/17/1998)
09/14/1998 RECEIVED & RETURNED plf’s decl for dflt jgm, dflt jgm, jgm on dflt, bill of costs & abstract of jgm. REASON: The cmp does not pray for administrative charges. Please note that the 3rd cause of actn appears to have been omitted from the prop dflt jgm papers & the decl does not make reference as to whether the 3rd cause has been settled. (gk) (Entered: 09/14/1998)
09/21/1998 3 DECLARATION of Martin Brachfeld by plaintiff USA for dflt jgm. (gk) Modified on 09/24/1998 (Entered: 09/24/1998)
09/21/1998 4 DEFAULT JUDGMENT BY CLERK: ADJUDGED that the United States of America, plf, do have & recover of & from Ronald A. Rale the sum of $23,767.10 principal, $9,440.12 accrued pre-jgm interest, $0.00 administrative charges, $176.00 costs, $1,336.02 atty fees for a total jgm amnt of $34,719.24, plus interest from 9/18/98 at the rate of $2.70 per day to date of entry of jgm. Jgm to accrue interest at the legal rate until paid. Case terminated . (ENT 9/24/98) MD JS-6. mld cpys. (gk) (Entered: 09/24/1998)
09/24/1998 5 BILL OF COSTS RETURNABLE submitted by plaintiff USA re [4-2] (gk) (Entered: 09/24/1998)
09/24/1998 COSTS taxed for plaintiff USA in the amount of $176.00 against defendant Ronald A. Rale. (gk) (Entered: 09/24/1998)
09/24/1998 RECEIVED & RETURNED plf’s decl for dflt jgm, dflt jgm, jgm on dflt, bill of costs, abstract of jgm. REASON: Subst svc of the sms & cmp made upon a “John Doe” and mail svc to the dft is insufficient for a clerk to enter dflt. (gk) (Entered: 09/24/1998)

[gopheraj]

I am going to notify the bar in California, which is all I can do because you are not a member of the bar in this court, and since you are not a member of the bar in this court,

Does anyone know if the CA bar has done anything on this?

[PeskyOne]

Thank you so much. I think this is another example of how devious and dishonest Howard K. Stern is. If he can’t win legally and fair; he’ll lie and steal. Taking those confidential documents was the same as stealing. I hope this little act comes back to bite him bigtime when he goes after the Marshall money.

[PeskyOne]

Thank you...I feel relieved already! :-)

[nature]

Entered CA Bar in 1988, first file I see is 1995! ???

Civil Cases

Name Court Case No. Filed NOS Closed
1 RALE, RONALD cacdce 8:2005cv01088 11/07/2005 446 11/17/2005
Gustafson v. State of California et al
2 RALE, RONALD A cacdce 2:1995cv02157 04/04/1995 110 10/24/1995
Lana Dorfman, et al v. Great Central Ins Co, et al
3 RALE, RONALD A cacdce 2:1994cv02698 04/25/1994 791 05/26/1995
Motion Pic Ind v. Leather Gems Ltd, et al
4 RALE, RONALD A cacdce 2:1998cv04091 05/26/1998 152 09/21/1998
USA v. Ronald A. Rale
5 RALE, RONALD A cacdce 2:2001cv08564 10/03/2001 110 01/14/2004
Liberty Ins Corp, et al v. Consolidated Human, et al
Criminal Cases

Name Court Case No. Filed Closed
6 RALE, RONALD ALAN azdce 2:1998cr00835 12/02/1998 03/20/2000
USA, et al v. Bragg

[nature]

Feb 9

It is conceivable the inheritance could be upwards of $500 million,” Goldman revealed. “It could get ugly.”

So did Anna have a will? Attorney Philip Boesch, who will continue to represent Smith’s side in the estate case, hints that she might have.

“She had I believe given some thought to an estate plan,” he said. “And that will come out.”

http://extratv.warnerbros.com/2007/02/what_will_happen_to_baby_danni.php?page=2

[baysider]

Has anyone contested the will that was submitted to the California probate court ?

[nature]

not that we know of yet. I think the time is up or just about up. Don’t look to loverLarrySue to do it.

[sodpoodle]

**So did Anna have a will?**

In Anna’s volatile states of mind - sober or not - she may periodically have wanted to - change her will, spend more time with family - make amends with her mother -IIRC, according to Virgie she did - and that must have scared HOwie.

Anything in the will that would have limited HOward’s *executor role* - creates a problem for him and his cronies.

It’s clear why he villified Virgie and created that *hate Mommy* video. He could not tolerate anyone but himself *owning* Anna Inc. Who else knew she would die so young?

That Marilyn Monroe idol worship is another crock. For, if Anna was a student of Marilyn - she certainly knew or read that Marilyn’s suicide was highly suspect. There has been that inference, Anna took CH as a copy cat act.

Fooling the proletariate ain’t working!!!!!!!!!

[baysider]

If Howie is the target of the investigation by the Attorney General’s office , he should be denied his request to serve as executor,IMHO. Also, we can assume that Anna didn’t read or fully understand what she signed. Even Judge Seidlin questioned that will, didn’t he ?

[Sacajaweau]

Seidlin surely did comment on the strange will. IMO, Howard actually lost his “will job” when Danny died...BECAUSE it excluded all others.