Skip to comments.
Why So Many Conservatives Don't Like Ron Paul
Right Wing News ^
Posted on 10/10/2007 12:18:58 PM PDT by mnehring
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-142 next last
1
posted on
10/10/2007 12:19:01 PM PDT
by
mnehring
To: lormand
ping (can you ping your list)
2
posted on
10/10/2007 12:19:21 PM PDT
by
mnehring
("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!"- Jim Robinson, Sept, 30, 2007)
To: mnehrling
Just taking a guess here... but might it be because he's a
?
3
posted on
10/10/2007 12:20:55 PM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: mnehrling
Dudes a freak show looking for a tent!
4
posted on
10/10/2007 12:22:54 PM PDT
by
geezerwheezer
(get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
To: mnehrling
5
posted on
10/10/2007 12:25:26 PM PDT
by
bcsco
("The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration.")
To: BibChr; mnehrling; ejonesie22; lormand; KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle; SJackson; MNJohnnie; ...
Just taking a guess here... but might it be because he's a...And a
6
posted on
10/10/2007 12:26:00 PM PDT
by
Allegra
("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!"- Jim Robinson, Sept, 30, 2007)
To: mnehrling
Bravo. If I could write...I would have written this article.
7
posted on
10/10/2007 12:26:50 PM PDT
by
svcw
(There is no plan B.)
To: Allegra
8
posted on
10/10/2007 12:27:15 PM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: mnehrling
That's not to say that Ron Paul doesn't have his strong points. He is committed to smaller government, slashing spending, liberty, and the Constitution. Ron Paul voted FOR the Islamic Lawmaker's House resolution respecting the Islamic month long celebration of Ramadan.
How does it fit in with his stance on small government (he normally votes against symbolic votes, regardless of how meaningless they are) and the Constitutional role for Congress?
9
posted on
10/10/2007 12:27:15 PM PDT
by
weegee
(NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
To: mnehrling
You can argue that's how the world should work, but it's not how the world does work. You can't simply undo decades of history and culture, with almost no support for doing so in your own party, the opposing party, or from the general population.Perhaps the best, most cogent, line in the entire post.
10
posted on
10/10/2007 12:27:51 PM PDT
by
bcsco
("The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration.")
To: Allegra
That picture reminds me of something I thought about this week. Ever notice how Bat Boy never got any older? He’s always the same in those photos.
11
posted on
10/10/2007 12:28:37 PM PDT
by
weegee
(NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
To: weegee
Vampires don’t age, silly!
12
posted on
10/10/2007 12:29:03 PM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: mnehrling
Condensed Version:
Paul’s an anti war nut.
13
posted on
10/10/2007 12:29:38 PM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(Hey, weren't you banned for being an idiot in another thread...)
To: mnehrling
For me it’s simple. He is completely disconnected with reality.
14
posted on
10/10/2007 12:29:42 PM PDT
by
CougarGA7
(I'm supporting a Conservative not a RINO http://www.gohunter08.com/)
To: weegee
Ever notice how Bat Boy never got any older?He had to stay young, Bat Man is so seriously trademarked and copyrighted, his butt would have been sued if he ever got past puberty.
15
posted on
10/10/2007 12:31:01 PM PDT
by
Tijeras_Slim
("mountainous pomposity and cloying spirituality")
To: mnehrling
He has definately captured the Kookcinich wing of the Party.
Pray for W and Our Troops
16
posted on
10/10/2007 12:33:25 PM PDT
by
bray
(Think "Betray U.S." Think Democrat)
To: bcsco
It does indeed sums up every argument made by the Paulinati.
The US has not grownup in a vacuum called the Constitution. We have as many beneficial Federal agencies that were not “Constitutional” as we do ones that suck. I bet the only ones who complain are that tiny minority.
17
posted on
10/10/2007 12:33:40 PM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(Hey, weren't you banned for being an idiot in another thread...)
To: Tijeras_Slim
18
posted on
10/10/2007 12:34:34 PM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(Hey, weren't you banned for being an idiot in another thread...)
To: bcsco
“You can argue that’s how the world should work, but it’s not how the world does work. You can’t simply undo decades of history and culture, with almost no support for doing so in your own party, the opposing party, or from the general population.”
How about if the “decades of history and culture” have led us to a headlong rush to socialism? We should support candidates who will continue the rush, just at a slower pace? I don’t get that thinking.
To: mnehrling
If you knock Ron Paul, you'll often have hordes of social misfits making obnoxious comments, spamming your polls, touting conspiracy theories, insulting conservatives in general, and doing everything possible to make nuisances of themselves. The pot heads living in Moms basement tend to have lots of time on their hands for that sort of thing. ;~))
20
posted on
10/10/2007 12:39:15 PM PDT
by
Ditto
(Global Warming: The 21st Century's Snake Oil)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-142 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson