1 posted on
09/28/2007 1:53:11 PM PDT by
LS
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: LS; firebrand
Lou Loumenick of the NY Post, a big liberal, panned the film. I don’t trust his reviews. He does not think that killing terrorists is the answer - I do!
2 posted on
09/28/2007 1:56:36 PM PDT by
juliej
(vote gop)
To: LS
I’m surprised. I might have to rent this film when it comes out on DVD.
To: LS
The outcome of this battle within a battle even elicited cheers from our small audience in mid-afternoon, and other reviewers say audiences everywhere erupt in cheers over the conclusion of this scene. I was going to post the review from our local paper this morning. The reviewer doesn't grasp what was going on in the "cheer" scene. He saw what was on the film, but couldn't connect with why the audience cheered.
Give you three guesses why he couldn't figure it out, but I'm sure you only need one.
4 posted on
09/28/2007 1:59:43 PM PDT by
Domandred
(Eagles soar, but unfortunately weasels never get sucked into jet engines)
To: LS
LS, I just came back from seeing this film. Absolutely amazing. 4 stars. Almost no PC-ness to it at all.
The only other film in the last 20 years that even *dared* to suggest some terrorists might come from the Middle East was Executive Decision (Kurt Russell, Halle Berry).
And it was very even-handed in the sense that 2 Saudis were portrayed as total heroes, intent on getting justice.
Did I say it was amazing?
6 posted on
09/28/2007 2:01:22 PM PDT by
NYS_Eric
To: LS
A bit of a relief I guess. It thought for sure that the bad guys would turn out to be white supremists, funded by corporate America, out to make muslims look bad, so that we can steal the oil.
7 posted on
09/28/2007 2:01:57 PM PDT by
SampleMan
(Islamic tolerance is practiced by killing you last.)
To: LS
Thanks LS ~ was fearing this would be just another stab-in-the-back, h8-America hit job.
Glad to be wrong.
8 posted on
09/28/2007 2:02:18 PM PDT by
b9
("Fred... doesn't suffer fools and he has the guts and the microphone to say what I think" ~ Samwise)
To: LS
Thanks for the review. I guess I’ll check this out, although I’ll have to suspend my disbelief that the Saudis would ever allow the FBI to operate there.
10 posted on
09/28/2007 2:04:56 PM PDT by
colorado tanker
(I'm unmoderated - just ask Bill O'Reilly)
To: LS
I stopped reading your review after the second paragraph only because I didn’t want too many plot details inadvertently exposed. That being said, I have been looking forward to this film for a while now and definitely plan on seeing it this weekend. It looks like a pretty good, intelligent action flick.
11 posted on
09/28/2007 2:05:20 PM PDT by
Drew68
To: LS
Thanks.
This article is just in time...we were just about to walk out the door to see this movie...
To: LS
where Mayes (naturally, the female always manages to separate herself from the rest of the group)Usually, the female trips and hurts their ankle while running away with the rest of the males!
After your fine review, I will now go and see this flick. I love action flicks but was wary of the Hollywood Hate America direction this movie may have taken.
14 posted on
09/28/2007 2:18:58 PM PDT by
Seeking the truth
(Sale on Pajama Patrol Badges & Pins @ www.0cents.com)
To: LS
Awesome!! I didn’t know it was the same director as “Very Bad Things.” I LOVED that movie! (I’m a sick puppy, I know.)
To: LS
I saw it this afternoon. Agree with your review. I enjoyed the movie. Nice change from the usual PC crap.
17 posted on
09/28/2007 2:23:33 PM PDT by
Lucas McCain
(The day may come when the courage of men will fail, but not this day.)
To: LS
I heard this movie is GOOD. Despite his liberal leanings, Jamie Foxx has developed into an excellent actor. I’ll forgive him for making “Booty Call.”
21 posted on
09/28/2007 2:27:09 PM PDT by
Extremely Extreme Extremist
(Hillary Clinton is the most corrupt presidential candidate to ever run for office)
To: LS
Whew- you have no IDEA how relieved I am to read your review..was really worried about this one..figured it would be a blame-America first film.
Look forward to seeing it..
29 posted on
09/28/2007 2:32:01 PM PDT by
SE Mom
(Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
To: LS
Good post. Saw the film today and it is excellent. Recommend it to anyone.
30 posted on
09/28/2007 2:33:02 PM PDT by
Nuc1
(NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
To: LS
Since LS recommends it, I must obey.
33 posted on
09/28/2007 2:39:21 PM PDT by
Enterprise
(Those who "betray us" also "Betray U.S." They're called DEMOCRATS!)
To: LS
I’m quite surprised. That’s not what I was expecting. Didn’t know it was Peter Berg. He’s very good. Looks like I’ll be seeing this afterall.
39 posted on
09/28/2007 2:47:53 PM PDT by
Sue Perkick
(And I hope that what I’ve done here today doesn’t force you to have a negative opinion of me….)
To: LS
Although I haven’t seen it, your review confirms my intuition from
seeing the commercial.
I figured “The Kingdom” might be a good, minimal Political-Correctness
Bovine Droppings film.
To redeem Jaime Foxx after following up a good film like “Ray”
with stuff like “Stealth” and “Jarhead”.
And “stuff” is a more polite descriptor that the ones I heard from
associates that regretted paying for admission to “Stealth” and “Jarhead”.
40 posted on
09/28/2007 2:50:51 PM PDT by
VOA
To: LS
Thanks, I was hoping to find a review on FR. Thank you very much
42 posted on
09/28/2007 3:11:21 PM PDT by
Tolik
To: LS
Thanks for the review!
I watched the trailers but was wondering if this Tom Clancey/Dale Brown/Stephan Coonts fan would like it.
Question, should we leave our 15 year old at her friends house?
44 posted on
09/28/2007 3:27:03 PM PDT by
Milwaukee_Guy
(Don't hit them between the eyes. Hit them right -in- the eyes!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson