Anything released under the GPL license is considered “free software” by the creator of the license. It’s also the “software freedom law center” that’s bringing the charges forth, which is probably just another one of Stallman’s many fronts. Get them all to quit misusing the word “free” if you want fewer misconceptions about whether it’s actually “free” or not.
So Free Societies aren’t really Free ...because they carry some obligations?
Uggg youre going to make me go to that unwashed moonbats site:
"The freedom to redistribute copies ***must*** include binary or executable forms of the program, ***as well as*** source code, for both modified and unmodified versions." -- http://www.fsf.org/licensing/essays/free-sw.html
Everyone in the world except the insanely obtuse who read the license or his thoughts on the license get this..
Get them all to quit misusing the word “free” if you want fewer misconceptions about whether it’s actually “free” or not.
Umm one of the many definitions of free is "Unguarded in expression or manner; open; frank."...