Ge do you own the copyrights to the code from BusyBox? No? well then you dont get to tell the people who *do* own those copy rights what software license they can use. I know you believe you should be able to exercises quasi dictatorial powers to make sure everyone used a licenses which either:
(A) Locks the code down so nobody can see it, alter it
or
(B) Allows businesses to take the code and never contribute back to the project
But in the real world Freedom means people might licenses their software under terms *you* don't like. That does not mean you should endorse their copyrights be violated.
Anyone can cry about freedom and liberty when people are doing something they agree with but only people who really believe in freedom would protect those who are doing something you disagree with..
I’m just calmly pointing out the absurdity of someone releasing software they call “free” then coming back and making demands from those who took it. If it’s not actually “free” they shouldn’t be claiming it is, but it is typical of leftist nutjobs like Stallman to pull such tricks.