Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: raccoonradio; ElectricStrawberry; red-dawg; Volunteer; Yo-Yo; Biggirl; MarkBsnr; Billthedrill; ...

Those who were merely being facetious can stop reading now.

The rest of you are contemptible.

(1) You have no allegiance to the Constitution of the United States.

(2) You’re immoral.

(3) You’re a caricature of hypocrisy.

You all bring shame upon FR. And what’s worse, you’re either too stupid, too ignorant or too corrupt to care.

If you want to live in a police state with a one party system, emigrate to North Korea. The rest of us took an oath to defend the Republic against the enemies of liberty and justice for all, and now we know who you are.


29 posted on 09/18/2007 7:33:14 PM PDT by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ConsistentLibertarian

I support the right of Kerry to speak. I support the right of the students to invite Kerry to speak to them. I support the right of students to ask questions if the forum provides for it. I do not support the student who was being disruptive. His rights to be heard do not override the rights of the others to participate in the forum. His actions deprived a whole room full of people of their rights.


32 posted on 09/18/2007 7:48:24 PM PDT by Enterprise (Those who "betray us" also "Betray U.S." They're called DEMOCRATS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: ConsistentLibertarian
By saying "18%-82%" I was in no way being facetious. When I left Howie's site, it was "18%-82%".

In your haste to put out your string of ad hominems, with a disclaimer, you forgot one thing. You don't know a damned thing about me.

By me saying "18%-82%" you've conducted your 10:33PM investigation of how I voted on that poll and came up with THAT buncha asinine ad hominems to throw around?

1) You have zero understanding of my allegience to the U.S. Constitution. You know absolutely nothing about me except that I said "18%-82%".

2) I don't care about your morals and I never will....nor your judgement of my morality based on me saying "18%-82%".

3) Nice tactic. Saw that one over at the DU. Create a strawman based on someone saying "18%-82%" and then call them a hypocrite based on.....nothing. Booga booga "18%-82%"...gonna round me up with your Fascistii for saying "18%-82%"?

You opinion of what me saying "18%-82%" does to the shame level of FR is asinine and irrelevant. Mayhaps your targetting me for saying "18%-82%" says something about you.

Stupid? Based on "18%-82%"...that's quite some "intelligence" ya got going.

Ignorant? Based on "18%-82%"...DO tell what I am ignorant on. Mayhaps I know nothing of this machine you have that rates the ignorance levels of someone based on them saying "18%-82%."

Corrupt? Based on "18%-82%"...really....don't even know where to go with that one. Yeah...I'm "corrupt."

What's it say about someone that makes up THAT list of ad hominems and targets someone that said "18%-82%"?

Stupid? Ignorant?

If you know what my tagline means, you know about the oath I took and the service I've given.....and you'd know that I couldn't care less how much contempt you have for me. Left my care factor for your feeeeeeeeeelings at the Benning school for boys a while ago.

Short answer: How about the next time you feel like going after people with a string of ad hominems, leave me out of it if I simply said "18%-82%."

53 posted on 09/19/2007 6:30:37 AM PDT by ElectricStrawberry (1/27 Wolfhounds...cut in half during the Clinton years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: ConsistentLibertarian
Am I one of the chosen?

And if I am chosen, is it as a 'facetious one' or as a 'contemptible'?

Will I be admitted through Your Mother-of-Pearley Gates?

Was my comment 'facetious enough?

57 posted on 09/19/2007 7:55:10 AM PDT by skeptoid (AA, UE, MBS (with clusters))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: ConsistentLibertarian; raccoonradio; ElectricStrawberry; red-dawg; Volunteer; Yo-Yo; Biggirl; ...
Those who were merely being facetious can stop reading now.

I'm not sure if I was being facetious or not. What signs should I look for to be certain?

The rest of you are contemptible.

I suppose that is all in the eye of the contempter.

(1) You have no allegiance to the Constitution of the United States.

None whatsoever? Darn. I'm in trouble then because I'm fairy sure at some point in my past I solemnly swore or affirmed something to that effect.

(2) You’re immoral.

Alright, now just hold on one minute. I don't mind being called contemptible, and I'm a little ticked about being accused of spitting on the Constitution, but how dare you call me immoral. I am amoral.

(3) You’re a caricature of hypocrisy.

To be a caricature of something is to mock it. Are you saying that I mock hypocrisy? That would by amorally, contemptibly, and unconstitutionally hypocritical of me.

You all bring shame upon FR. And what’s worse, you’re either too stupid, too ignorant or too corrupt to care.

What is the difference between Ignorance and Apathy? I don't know and I don't care.

If you want to live in a police state with a one party system, emigrate to North Korea. The rest of us took an oath to defend the Republic against the enemies of liberty and justice for all, and now we know who you are.

Gee, I think I just made "The List." Lighten up, Francis.


58 posted on 09/19/2007 9:32:14 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson