To: Charles Henrickson; PJ-Comix
112 undergraduate observers were shown videos of the backsides of the volunteers as they walked at various speeds on the treadmill. The observers were able to determine the volunteers' sexual orientation with an overall rate of accuracy that exceeded chancePossible BenBurch alert. ;)
3 posted on
09/12/2007 2:13:37 PM PDT by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("Proudly keeping one iron boot on the necks of libertarian faux 'conservatives' since 1958!")
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
112 undergraduate observers were shown videos... Tells ME they have a lot of gay undergrads at that school............
7 posted on
09/12/2007 2:15:51 PM PDT by
Red Badger
(ALL that CARBON in ALL that oil & coal was once in the atmospere. We're just putting it back!)
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Wait a minute... A subject pool size of
just 8 men and 8 women!? That is so small as to be ridiculous.
Although I agree with their premise/theory - that you can often tell someone's sexual orientation from subtle clues - their methods and sample size put them in the realm of not too serious "researchers."
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson