I thought she was already divorced when she began dating Norman. AT least that is what the article implied, ie. she had just divorced Mills.
The article also doesn’t address the GROUNDS for Chris’s divorce from Mill or why Mill considered Norman’s behavior a “betrayal”.
One could draw the conclusion that Chris’s divorce, involving a large payment to Mill, indicated no fault by Mill..
To believe the “love affair” commenced AFTER the twin divorces is naive - at best.
The KEY word I drew from Mill’s statement, was “who considered Norman his “best friend”, was heartbroken by his betrayal” - was BETRAYAL.
I wouldn’t consider having my ex-wife marry my best friend - after a divorce ABSENT of adultery - a BETRAYAL.