Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: river rat

I thought she was already divorced when she began dating Norman. AT least that is what the article implied, ie. she had just divorced Mills.


92 posted on 09/08/2007 10:12:54 PM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: nwrep
The timing of the two divorces — doesn’t bear at all on when they started screwing around....

The article also doesn’t address the GROUNDS for Chris’s divorce from Mill or why Mill considered Norman’s behavior a “betrayal”.

One could draw the conclusion that Chris’s divorce, involving a large payment to Mill, indicated no fault by Mill..

To believe the “love affair” commenced AFTER the twin divorces is naive - at best.

The KEY word I drew from Mill’s statement, was “who considered Norman his “best friend”, was heartbroken by his betrayal” - was BETRAYAL.

I wouldn’t consider having my ex-wife marry my best friend - after a divorce ABSENT of adultery - a BETRAYAL.

93 posted on 09/08/2007 11:02:04 PM PDT by river rat (Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson