Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Student, prof build budget supercomputer (gigaflops on the cheap)
Calvin.Edu ^ | August 30 , 2007 | Allison Graff

Posted on 08/31/2007 9:15:39 AM PDT by N3WBI3

Student, prof build budget supercomputer
August 30 , 2007

Tim Brom stands next to supercomputer MicrowulfWhen Tim Brom 07’ set out to build a budget supercomputer with Calvin computer science professor Joel Adams, he didn’t know the product of his efforts might end up in his checked baggage headed for England.

Brom, now a graduate student at the University of Kentucky continuing his studies in computer science, worked with Adams to build Microwulf, a machine that is among the smallest and least expensive supercomputers on the planet.

“It’s small enough to check on an airplane or fit next to a desk,” said Brom.

This may prove useful next summer when Brom and others from his graduate program travel to England to do work that will require “a significant amount of computing power.” And as the price of commercial supercomputers is often prohibitive for many educational institutions, bringing a “personal” supercomputer like Microwulf could be a cost-effective solution for the group of graduate researchers.

“So far as we can tell, this is the first supercomputer to have this low price/performance ratio—the first to cost less than $100/Gflop,” said Adams.

This is a significant achievement considering that Microwulf is more than twice as fast as Deep Blue, the IBM-created supercomputer that beat world chess champion Gary Kasparov in 1997, and cost only a fraction of the $5 million spent to build Deep Blue.

Microwulf has been measured to process 26.25 gigaflops, or 26.25 billion double-precision floating point instructions, per second. It achieves this performance by relying on four dual-core motherboards connected by an 8-port Gigabyt Ethernet switch. The connected components form a three-tiered system that looks like a triple-decker sandwich.

Design of supercomputer Microwulf

Supercomputers like Microwulf are used to solve problems that take too much number-crunching for an ordinary desktop to handle, either because its processor is too slow, or because it doesn’t have enough memory, said Adams. Truly huge supercomputers (more than 100 times as fast as Microwulf) are used by organizations like the National Weather Service to process meteorological data and by the United States Missile Defense Agency to simulate nuclear tests.

Microwulf is considered a Beowulf cluster, a group of networked computers that run open source software and work in parallel to solve a single problem. Beowulf clusters are so named because their homemade, cost-effective nature liberates researchers from expensive commercial options for super-computing, much like Beowulf of the Old English poem liberated the Danes from the tyrannical rule of Grendel.

Do Brom and Adams see themselves as “liberators” by unveiling of a system like Microwulf?

“We’re taking the liberation a step further,” said Adams. “Instead of a bunch of researchers having to share a single Beowulf cluster supercomputer, now each researcher can have their own.”

Just two years ago, building a personal supercomputer like Microwulf for the price of a high-performance desktop was out of the realm of possibility for Adams and Brom. But when they saw a portable Beowulf cluster called Little Fe at a conference in October 2005, they began to think about building their system.

Learn More

Learn more about Microwulf from a report at Cluster Monkey.

Visit Joel Adam's Web site to find out more about Microwulf's design, performance and pricing.

Discover the world of Beowulf clusters.

Read about Joel Adams' grant to build a new supercomputer for Calvin.

“I was really enjoying my high-performance computing class and wanted to keep working in that area after the class ended. I was also thinking about graduate school at the time and a project like Microwulf looks good on a curriculum vitae,” said Brom.

So by the summer of 2006 when the price of hardware materials needed to build Microwulf had gone down, Adams asked his academic department to provide $2500 for the project. He also asked Brom, then beginning his last year at Calvin, to help him build the supercomputer. In January of 2007, they began to piece together their system and by March, they were running tests to see just what Microwulf could do. In the end, the project came in under budget with Microwulf donning a price-tag of just $2470. With current hardware prices, another system like Microwulf would cost half of what it cost Adams and Brom to build earlier this year.

Though supercomputers are typically evaluated on their price/performance ratio, Adams built Microwulf giving attention to its power/performance ratio as well. In other words, he wanted to pay attention to the system’s energy consumption.

“This is becoming increasingly important, as excess power consumption is inefficient and generates waste heat, which can in turn decrease reliability,” said Adams on his Web site.

Adams and Brom managed to build Microwulf so that it could plug into one standard 120V wall outlet. This feature only enhances the system’s portability, allowing it to be taken to classrooms and other research labs where large power supplies are unavailable.

Adams isn’t going to let Microwulf gather dust in the supercomputing lab in the Science Building. Instead he’s going to take it out on the road, mostly to middle school and high school classrooms to try and get teenagers hooked on computer science.

Microwulf’s inventors aren’t set on keeping their blueprints for the supercomputer a secret. In fact, they’ve just published a detailed description and evaluation of their project on Cluster Monkey so others can build their own portable and affordable supercomputers.

It remains to be seen whether Brom will be able to get his wire-filled personal supercomputer past airport security next summer.

~written by Allison Graff, web communications coordinator



TOPICS: Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: christianeducation; computers; doityourself; linux; michigan; opensource; supercomputer; technology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: N3WBI3
Wasn’t over my head at all, I was simply pointing out you boys are the open sorcerers not me.
21 posted on 09/01/2007 1:11:24 AM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
I simply don’t believe in making technology of this caliber completely “open” so that adversaries of the US are free to copy it and implement in their military programs.

What do you plan on doing about it? Licensing scientists and researchers? Banning all scientific research not under government control? Outlawing compilers unless under government license?

22 posted on 09/01/2007 1:43:06 AM PDT by garbanzo (Government is not the solution to our problems. Government is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: garbanzo

A failure of government control is how this technology got on the streets to begin with. The clustering software was originally developed by NASA who released it to the world at large, for free. Recent reports have NASA workers refusing to cooperate with background security investigations, sounds like a good time for a purge to me.

New developments like these need to be classified accordingly and export controlled. The “no borders for technology crowd” will claim that the US will fall behind the rest of the world, which simply isn’t correct as we are doing most of the advancement in these fields anyway, and to hear them speak if foreign companiesor governments develop it instead they would share it freely with us, put us in the revrse position of getting our technology for free, which wouldn’t happen for long if they ever passed us to begin with.

It’s all an obvious ploy by the one worlders to milk the US of technology, insult us by insisting we’re not the primary ones coming up with this stuff to begin with etc.


23 posted on 09/01/2007 6:54:51 AM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
A failure of government control is how this technology got on the streets to begin with.

So the answer is basically scientific totalitarianism?

foreign companiesor governments develop it instead they would share it freely with us

As pointed out above, Linux was developed initially in Finland. It's not like people outside the US are stupid (if you don't believe me then read any of the top journals in any field) - if nothing will destroy us, then arrogance like that will.

24 posted on 09/01/2007 7:15:18 AM PDT by garbanzo (Government is not the solution to our problems. Government is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: garbanzo
ROFL, what?

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/totalitarian - of or pertaining to a centralized government that does not tolerate parties of differing opinion and that exercises dictatorial control over many aspects of life.

Putting a few export controls on technology that is currently being given away to the world for free hardly meets this definition. But leave it to the supporters of such giveaways to make such claims.

I never said people outside this country were stupid either, of course, but if Linux is your supposed shining example of their ingenuity you should keep in mind it was a clone of our already existing and superior Unix product, created by someone who didn’t want to pay for Unix. He’s now moved to the US of course where the product finally grew in features after US corporations advanced it for him, but be sure and let me know if/when someone working outside this country ever comes up with something equivalent to Unix or our clustering technology completely on their own.

25 posted on 09/01/2007 8:28:59 AM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle; N3WBI3
After seeing N3WBI3's thorough factual trashing of you, I could tell which lies and hypocrisies you were spewing just by reading his responses. I just had to turn the filter off, and saw this really fun bit:

Recent reports have NASA workers refusing to cooperate with background security investigations

True, employees who have nothing whatsoever to do with any sensitive operations or data are wondering why they need to have background checks done. From the description, it looks like the checks are equivalent to what is done for a SECRET clearance. Yeah, a JPL employee who has been working there for nearly 40 years with no access to classified information suddenly needs a highly invasive background check. This is the kind of thing that will make our best scientists think twice about using their talents for the benefit of the government.

"Many of the plaintiffs only agreed to work for NASA with the understanding that they would not have to work on classified materials or to undergo any type of security clearance."

Any replies not sticking to the subject will be ignored.

26 posted on 09/01/2007 9:40:41 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
Putting a few export controls on technology that is currently being given away to the world for free hardly meets this definition.

We do still have export controls. But for certain technologies, mainly anything dealing with software, we our government rightly realizes that there is nothing we can make that nobody else can make too, and that insulating ourselves will hurt us.

The hacker you referenced once, a big contributor to BSD, is an Australian. One of the best cryptographers in the world, the one who is finding weaknesses in hashes, is Chinese. The guy who invented the WWW is from the UK. Of course there's even Dutchman Edsger Dijkstra and Norwegians Ole-Johan Dahl and Kristen Nygaard (you can thank them for object-oriented programming).

Countries all over the world, including Russia and China, produce top-class computer science graduates every year. Why do you think it's so often the Russians we hear cracking things? It's because their education system also produces people with the talent to do it. There is no way we can keep the lead by isolating ourselves. There's pretty much no barrier to entry if you have the knowledge: get a computer and start programming.

Microprocessors are a different story. Those take serious technology and massive infrastructure that is very difficult for anyone to develop even if they have the knowledge, and we are by far in the lead. That's why we only let the grandparents of the current generation process go to China (We're at 45nm and Intel's setting up 90nm in China for the local market).

27 posted on 09/01/2007 9:57:31 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
But for certain technologies, mainly anything dealing with software, we our government rightly realizes that there is nothing we can make that nobody else can make too, and that insulating ourselves will hurt us.

Your English seems to be breaking down, but it appears this is your defense for the removal of export controls on software in Bill Clinton's last day in office.

Why do you think it's so often the Russians we hear cracking things?

Ah, defending your Russian heroes again as usual. Obviously because traditionally Russians are much better at stealing things than developing things on their own. Ever seen their space shuttle? Vaguely remind you of ours LMAO?


28 posted on 09/01/2007 10:16:42 AM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

Yeah if we can follow your advice and cease more security investigations of NASA employees the Russians should be able to work out the few remainining incompatibilities in their “design” LMAO.


29 posted on 09/01/2007 10:19:37 AM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
Ever seen their space shuttle?

Yeah, I remember they never got it working right either.

30 posted on 09/01/2007 3:08:14 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
Yeah if we can follow your advice and cease more security iinvestigations of NASA employees the Russians should be able to work out the few remainining incompatibilities in their “design” LMAO.

You are not understanding the basic concept here: these people are not working on anything classified. If we don't want NASA technology to go to the Russians or Chinese, we classify it. Then the only people who can see it are those who have had background checks done and passed. We do that to a lot of technology. It's kind of the reason why we have a security classification system in the first place.

Besides, to extend such investigations to people with no access to classified material is a waste of our limited investigative resources. We have a lot of people actually seeking security clearances, and government agencies trying to hire them for sensitive positions, who I'm sure would love to have their investigations done more quickly -- but no, we're investigating some 60 year-old typist who has never seen a classified document.

31 posted on 09/01/2007 3:16:51 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

Things don’t have to be “classified” to to be important, obviously as far as you’re concerned “sensitive but unclassified” information doesn’t deserve protection but is simply further proof of how ignorant your position is.

You’ll have a tough time exceeding your admitted lies that the DoD used software written by Russian hackers, but keep posting your bunk so more people can learn every day of your endless and appalling support for Russian thieves of US technology.


32 posted on 09/01/2007 3:32:23 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
they never got it working right either.

Another pathetic excuse for your continued support of the ongoing Russian theft of US technology.

33 posted on 09/01/2007 3:34:02 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
Things don’t have to be “classified” to to be important, obviously as far as you’re concerned “sensitive but unclassified” information doesn’t deserve protection

You don't appear to have read the article. We're not even talking about that kind of information here. These background checks include people with access to only non-sensitive information, and even to NO information. It includes even the janitors. No, don't go off about a janitor in sensitive areas, as they must be escorted anyway.

What we're talking about here is a gross waste of resources because some high-up bureaucrat made a blanket order to investigate everyone whether their position requires it or not.

34 posted on 09/01/2007 3:40:26 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3

This is neat! And affordable to boot!


35 posted on 09/01/2007 3:44:49 PM PDT by sauropod (You can’t spell crap without the AP in it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

It’s quite common to require a National Agency Check (NAC) for any full time employee at US government installations where military or aerospace development is being conducted, but it’s obvious you won’t dare let standard security protocol get in the way of your defense of free technology for hackers and spies from Russia. Based on the obvious duplication attempt of the US space shuttle by Russia, NASA is one of the main locations that needs further tightening of security, but here you are defending your comrades again of course.


36 posted on 09/01/2007 3:48:13 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
Another pathetic excuse for your continued support of the ongoing Russian theft of US technology.

You don't know much about the Buran. It was a visual copy of our shuttle because that's what they saw on TV and other public sources, and their tests in making such a vehicle didn't produce anything that was better than our design. Otherwise, AFAIK the Buran was entirely Russian technology, which is why so many things about it are different, especially in the rocket technology used (the Russians didn't do solid or reusable rockets well). OTOH, parts of it were superior to our shuttle.

Of course the only one left of theirs in decent condition is sitting in an outdoor museum, while ours are still flying.

37 posted on 09/01/2007 4:30:57 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
parts of it were superior to our shuttle.

Keep posting your trash in support of your Russian heroes that steal their technology from the US, I'm here to expose sellouts like you and your self incriminating posts make it all the easier.

38 posted on 09/01/2007 4:37:32 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
It’s quite common to require a National Agency Check (NAC) for any full time employee at US government installations where military or aerospace development is being conducted

Obviously not at the world-famous JPL for decades. I guess they did things smart, like match investigation level requirements to positions, then only require such investigations for people in those positions.

Taking this into the area of security clearances, the days where anyone who can pass the checks can get a clearance are gone. Your desired position is supposed to be involved with information at that level of clearance before they'll give you that level of clearance. It is an efficient allocation of resources.

What they and you want is the equivalent of giving clearances to everyone, whether they need it or not. It is a waste of government resources and a danger to our national technological superiority (and therefore security) as we lose top scientists who would rather not have their privacy invaded.

39 posted on 09/01/2007 4:42:30 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
Keep posting your trash

Now you see why I blocked you again. You can never argue the facts. Instead you go on vile personal attacks when the facts start going against you. It is quite childish, and the reason we think you're posting this from your mom's basement.

BTW, what was superior was the tile arrangement.

40 posted on 09/01/2007 4:46:01 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson