I heard it on Fox News this evening. The whole thing is bizarre. It would appear to be a set up. First Craig has to wait for an available stall. Who hasn’t? He uses the facility, and is handed a card from the police department?
Craig should have said the following 4 words, “I want my attorney”.
Frankly I don’t care if he’s gay. It doesn’t sound like he was cruising, though.
I think if he was really NOT guilty.. I would think that he would have cooperated with the officer.... Thanked him for his service PROFUSELY...... and politely tell him that he had made a mistake.... HOWEVER his argumentative attitude has guilt written all over it....IMHO I have arrested folks that... after further analysis/questioning... I truley did not believe were GUILTY... but the “probable cause” was there at the time and most are VERY coopertive with the process, and understand that I am just doing my job.... An interview with an INNOCENT person does not usually “go down” Iexcuse the pun...) like this, form my personal experience....... a CHARGE, or being QUESTIONED about a POSSIBLE CHARGE... is a far cry from conviction.. a plea of GUILTY IS A CONVICTION.. HANDS DOWN... or should I say.. HANDS “under the stall” !!..
If he reached his hand under the next stall,(which he seems to admit) I think he was cruising.