To: Sopater
What does evolutionary theory have to tell us about the positive aspects of genetic defects? More importantly, what does it tell us about the human capacity for altruism and compassionthe very things Dr. Boehm is advocating? The answer is: nothing. And what important information does Chuck Colson have to share with us about evolutionary theory? The answer is: nothing.
2 posted on
08/28/2007 2:29:51 PM PDT by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: Coyoteman
The ToE falls so woefully short of dealing with anything except the mechanics of how life allegedly progressed that it’s ridiculous that it should even be applied by doctors or scientists.
It’s this sort of behavior that reinforces the belief that Darwinism is a belief system and Darwinists have an agenda.
Just like evos constantly complain that theology has no place in science, it can be equally said here that the ToE has no place in dealing with moral, social, and ethical issues. Keep Darwinism and the TOE in the labs where it belongs.
3 posted on
08/28/2007 2:53:57 PM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: Coyoteman
And what important information does Chuck Colson have to share with us about evolutionary theory? The answer is: nothing.
Wow, Coyoteman. That counterpoint was brilliant. I don't suppose you actually have an answer to the question of how to explain altruism and compassion as a result of evolution being one of the resident experts on the subject.
4 posted on
08/28/2007 2:54:10 PM PDT by
Sopater
(A wise man's heart inclines him to the right, but a fool's heart to the left. ~ Ecclesiastes 10:2)
To: Coyoteman
And what important information does Chuck Colson have to share with us about evolutionary theory? The answer is: nothing. He imparts the information that one Darwinist has to stand up in front of all the other Darwinists and yell "Stop" because they're all thinking that ruipping a small child limb from limb is OK idf the small child has a low IQ.
22 posted on
08/28/2007 7:17:29 PM PDT by
Mr. Silverback
(Libs obviously don’t believe pro-lifers are terrorists, or they'd placate us by banning abortion.)
To: Coyoteman; metmom; Sopater; Coleus; wagglebee; Curiousity; NYer; Jedi Master Pikachu; Salvation
Since Coyoteman accused IDers of attempting to overthrow the government and implement theocracy in
this thread I think he has as much credibility on this subject or any subject relating to evolutionary theory and society as Pee Wee Herman does. Note the subject of the linked thread and the way he dodges the question of whether eliminating religious practice is a legitimate major goal for scientists.
26 posted on
08/28/2007 7:30:18 PM PDT by
Mr. Silverback
(Libs obviously don’t believe pro-lifers are terrorists, or they'd placate us by banning abortion.)
To: Coyoteman
“And what important information does Chuck Colson have to share with us about evolutionary theory? The answer is: nothing”
With all do respect coyote, you make derogatory comments like these on these threads and then bitch about people who have a problem with TOE....and then turn around and call foul when opinions don’t line up with your beliefs because they are , in your opinion, not science.....so what?
We believe in Creationism, and you do not. You believe in TOE, and we do not. Quit the name-calling and condescension, if you please....
54 posted on
08/29/2007 8:18:35 AM PDT by
scottdeus12
(Jesus is real, whether you believe in Him or not.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson