The ToE falls so woefully short of dealing with anything except the mechanics of how life allegedly progressed that it’s ridiculous that it should even be applied by doctors or scientists.
It’s this sort of behavior that reinforces the belief that Darwinism is a belief system and Darwinists have an agenda.
Just like evos constantly complain that theology has no place in science, it can be equally said here that the ToE has no place in dealing with moral, social, and ethical issues. Keep Darwinism and the TOE in the labs where it belongs.
That's funny. Last time I checked, the mechanics of how life progressed, to use your wording, is all the ToE attempts to deal with.
That is historiological and the major modern application of the concept of evolution. It has nothing to do with Darwinianism.