Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu
It held audiences as no film of that length has in recent memory. It deserved its success. Yes the dialogue was banal but again if that was all there was to a film then adaptations of Shakespeare and other great plauys would automatically make the best films.
91 posted on 08/30/2007 8:11:14 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: Borges

Nobody will ever be able to adequately explain what Titanic did at the box office. Paramount must have pooped themselves in fear on opening weekend, they spent $200 million making the movie and it opened at $28 million. That should have been one of the most gigantic flops in cinema history. But then it continued to make around $30 million every weekend for 3 whole months. It’s really weird, that never happens, the movie never found a huge audience on any weekend. Much like the story the box office of the movie just kept plodding along. And of course now 10 years later it’s one of the most insulted movies ever.

It’s not a matter of the dialog being all their it’s. It’s a matter of technique not being able to turn a bad movie into a good movie. Movies are about a lot of things, directorial technique is on the list, but it’s just a piece of the pie, they tell a story which should be good, they have actors that shouldn’t suck, there’s a lot to go wrong in a movie. And the fact that a really good story can be told with incredibly plain directing and still be a good movie shows technique really isn’t that important.


94 posted on 08/30/2007 8:23:44 AM PDT by discostu (indecision may or may not be my biggest problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson