Posted on 08/19/2007 12:35:53 PM PDT by Perdogg
| American Football Conference | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| East | W | L | T | Pct |
| New England (1) | 12 | 4 | 0 | .750 |
| New York | 8 | 8 | 0 | .500 |
| Buffalo | 7 | 9 | 0 | .438 |
| Miami | 7 | 9 | 0 | .438 |
| North | W | L | T | Pct |
| Baltimore (3) | 12 | 4 | 0 | .750 |
| Cincinnati | 8 | 8 | 0 | .500 |
| Pittsburgh | 8 | 8 | 0 | .500 |
| Cleveland | 4 | 12 | 0 | .250 |
| South | W | L | T | Pct |
| Indianapolis (4) | 10 | 6 | 0 | .750 |
| Houston (6) | 9 | 7 | 0 | .563 |
| Tennessee | 7 | 9 | 0 | .438 |
| Jacksonville | 7 | 9 | 0 | .438 |
| West | W | L | T | Pct |
| San Diego (2) | 12 | 4 | 0 | .750 |
| Denver (5) | 10 | 6 | 0 | .625 |
| Kansas City | 9 | 7 | 0 | .563 |
| Oakland | 4 | 12 | 0 | .250 |
| National Football Conference | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| East | W | L | T | Pct |
| Dallas (1) | 11 | 5 | 0 | .688 |
| Philadelphia | 9 | 7 | 0 | .563 |
| New York | 7 | 9 | 0 | .438 |
| Washington | 6 | 10 | 0 | .375 |
| North | W | L | T | |
| Chicago (2) | 10 | 6 | 0 | .625 |
| Green Bay | 9 | 7 | 0 | .563 |
| Minnesota | 7 | 9 | 0 | .438 |
| Detroit | 3 | 13 | 0 | .188 |
| South | W | L | T | Pct |
| New Orleans (4) | 9 | 7 | 0 | .563 |
| Carolina | 8 | 8 | 0 | .500 |
| Tampa Bay | 5 | 11 | 0 | .313 |
| Atlanta | 4 | 12 | 0 | .250 |
| West | W | L | T | Pct |
| St Louis (3) | 10 | 6 | 0 | .625 |
| San Francisco (5) | 9 | 7 | 0 | .563 |
| Seattle | 8 | 8 | 0 | .500 |
| Arizona | 5 | 11 | 0 | .313 |
That being said, I'll watch the Twins pretty much any day over the Vikings.
Perdogg, you’re the greatest!
Other predictions by noted publications. Please pass on any you read:
Athlon Sports: New England over Dallas
Sports Illustrated: New Orleans over San Diego
ESPN the Magazine: New England over Dallas
The Sporting News (2):
Indianapolis over New Orleans
New England over Dallas
Playboy:????
I don’t get why people are projecting Dallas into the Super Bowl. Tony Romo is inconsistent at best and Terrell Owens is just waiting to demolish that team.
The comment I heard on ESPN radio today was that the Dallas Defense will improve greatly under Wade Phillips and that defense is excited about the change of coaches.
It’s hard to imagine that Wade Phillips knows more about running a defense than Bill Parcells.
IMO, the only reason Phillips was hired to replace Parcells is that he’ll go along with everything Jerry Jones wants. Jones is the NFC version of Al Davis.
Bill Parcells should give last year’s salary back. He was worthless.
I happen to agree... He had the same look when he was coaching the New England Patriots in his final year..
Baltimore 10-6
Pittsburgh 9-7
Indianapolis 11-5
Houston 7-9
Kansas City 8-8
Philadelphia 11-5
Detroit 7-9
Tampa Bay 9-7 weakest strength of schedule in the league
Arizona 9-7
But then again I always suck at pick 'em... fortunately I'll see you in fantasy football.
Speaking of Parcells, I suggest you check profootballtalk.com They have a very interesting story about Parcells wanting to be GM of the Giants during the 2006 season.
You got everything but Super Bowl XLII final correct.
It could still happen, yes?
Big game today!
I got the AFC Championship right.
And so did my 4-year old niece.
LOL, Did she get it right back in August?
NFC — “New England (1) over San Diego (2)”
Nice job! I think NE was generally considered a lock after about week four or five; GB was also considered by the time they played Dallas in the regular season. The Giants (and therefore Eli Manning) in the Super Bowl? Not a lot foresaw that I think. :’)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.