Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Psycho_Bunny

Apparently...but I’d say that those two in the Star Wars prequel were least convincing, period - not just when it came to the on screen romance. For a long anticipated, big name movie it had some atrocious acting (Yoda and Obi Wan being exceptions).


7 posted on 08/19/2007 9:56:33 AM PDT by Old_Mil (Rudy = Hillary, Fred = Dole, Romney = Kerry, McCain = Crazy. No Thanks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Old_Mil
The acting was pretty bad.

Agree with you on Yoda's 'acting.'

Sort of pathetic when 'top actor' goes to a computer-generated animation (though Frank Oz did a decent job on the voice).

Ian McDarmid (spelling?) was more convincing as Emperor (even in Episode 3) than he was as Senator and Chancellor.

12 posted on 08/19/2007 10:04:25 AM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Old_Mil
For a long anticipated, big name movie it had some atrocious acting (Yoda and Obi Wan being exceptions).

The word "putrid" comes to mind. It's almost as though the casting and screenplay were deliberately crafted with MST3K in mind.

For a while there, I was annoyed that Lucas was abandoning the final trilogy. Since viewing the Anakin/Padme cringe-fest, I no longer question his decision.

26 posted on 08/19/2007 4:58:07 PM PDT by Charles Martel (The Tree of Liberty thirsts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson