Posted on 08/15/2007 6:20:55 AM PDT by danno3150
Curt Schilling expressed no emotion yesterday after being informed that attorneys representing slugger Barry Bonds may be targeting the Red Sox [team stats] pitcher for comments he made about the San Francisco Giants to HBO’s Bob Costas.
In a joint statement, attorneys Todd Schneider and John Burris said they are representing Bonds “in connection with legal issues arising from the myriad of false statements attributed to him by players, the media and others.”
Attorney Michael Rains, who has represented Bonds in the slugger’s ongoing BALCO steroids case, told the San Jose Mercury News, “This is directed at Schilling more than anybody. Schilling said some things that were inappropriate and potentially defamatory. I know it was upsetting to Barry. We talked about the issue and I know he was talking to some civil lawyers to put people on notice that he has someone defending him.”
Schilling, when told of the statement issued by Schneider and Burris, said, “I didn’t read it and I don’t have any comment about it. That’s not something I’m going to talk about.”
In a recent appearance on the HBO program “Costas Now,” Schilling brought up Kimberly Bell, a former mistress of Bonds who in 2000 testified before a grand jury about the slugger’s steroid use. She also testified that Bonds gave her money to buy a new home - money, she said, that came from baseball card shows that was not reported to the IRS.
“If I wrote a book about Bob Costas and in that book I wrote about Bob Costas’ girlfriend being on the road, and Bob Costas giving that girlfriend card show money and I outlined your daily steroid regimen, I’ve got to believe your first line of defense is to sue my (butt) off,” Schilling told Costas.
In their joint statement, Schneider and Burris said they “want the public to know that Barry’s silence in the face of the accusations should not be construed as an admission of any kind. In fact, Mr. Bonds retained Schneider and Burris because of the false nature of these statements. While pursuing Hank Aaron’s home run record, Barry felt that it was more prudent to remain silent. Now that the record has been broken, Burris and Schneider will evaluate any and all statements attributed to him that are false. His attorneys are particularly concerned about individuals profiting from his accomplishments by attributing statements and/or conversations to him that never occurred.”
In the aftermath of the Schilling interview on HBO, Bonds referred to Costas as “a midget who knows (nothing) about baseball,” and said, “Don’t worry, my day will come.”
If Schneider and Burris are to be believed, that day may have arrived.
In their statement, Schneider and Burris said, “certain members of the public and of the media are attempting to personally profit by making false and misleading comments about Mr. Bonds. This conduct has to stop and should not be tolerated by a society which prides itself on free, open and fair public dialogue.”
Calls to Burris and Schneider were not immediately returned.
I love Schilling. This should be interesting.
More legal posturing. This will never go beyond the stage of lawyers exchanging nasty letters & issuing public statements. Now if Bonds were to be facing Schilling in the batter’s box anytime soon — THAT would be interesting.
“...Now if Bonds were to be facing Schilling in the batter’s box anytime soon...”
Ain’t gonna happen. At least in the remaining regular season skeds for boston and San Francisco. Might happen in the post season.
“...Now if Bonds were to be facing Schilling in the batter’s box anytime soon...”
Ain’t gonna happen. At least not in the remaining regular season skeds for Boston and San Francisco. Might happen in the post season.
Sorry for the dbl post.
I know that won't happen. The Giants aren't in any 'danger' of making the playoffs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.