You are incorrect. I stated that the way you rant reminds me of them. You have this one chance to retract your false claim.
They're apparently one of your favorite fringe groups you like to bring up when you are attacking true Christians.
Stay clear of the "No True Scotsman" logical fallacy. They are an example of what extremists of any group, even groups that are currently generally civilized, are capable of.
AR,
That fallacy holds to a point. e.g with a Scotsman you can say by lineage he either is or is not. So if I said not true Scotsman is 100% German I would be correct. If we look at Christians there is a much fizzier line but there is a line non the less.
There are parts of Christian belief that are a must, deny these you deny the person of Christ and cease to be a Christian (though you may still be a nice guy and one heck of a line dancer). Then there are other points of debate which while interesting and heated is not an issue that should cause a party to leave or be removed from the church.
Example of the former: The nature of Christ is he (a) Devine, (b) eternally God from and for all time, (c) part of the triune God? If you say not he was not, you’re not a Christian.
Example of the later: The persistent virginity of Mary, If you think after the birth of Christ she had relations (as would seem to be indicated by Mark) it does not take away from the nature of God or Christ just as if you believe she abstained for her whole life.
Go dig it up, you brought up some cult and said I was probably in it, and then like today tried to claim I was defending them when I never even heard of them LOL. Typical lies, attacks on Christians etc we’re used to from you, there’s nothing left to this discussion but more of the same obviously.
Gold Eagle Out