Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

3rd SPP summit shrouded in secrecy
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | August 13, 2007 | Jerome R. Corsi

Posted on 08/13/2007 4:04:42 AM PDT by Man50D

President Bush will interrupt his summer vacation in Crawford, Texas, next week to attend the third summit meeting of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, or SPP, slated for Aug. 20 and 21 in Montebello, Quebec, at the five-star Fairmont Le Chateau Montebello resort.

Bush will meet with Mexico's President Felipe Calderon and Canada's Prime Minister Stephen Harper at the event.

The meeting has been hidden in a cloud of secrecy until WND obtained from an Access to Information Act request a previously unreleased copy of a government report detailing agenda plans for the third SPP summit.

According to WND has reported that a multinational business agenda is driving this upcoming SPP summit according to the heavily redacted document obtained from the Canadian government.

The memo clearly states at center stage in the Montebello SPP summit will be recommendations by the North American Competitiveness Council, regarding promoting North American competitiveness for multinational corporations through "integrating" and "harmonizing" regulations between Mexico, Canada and the U.S.

The council, an executive group composed of 10 top multinational corporations from each of the three SPP countries, was constituted under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Commerce to provide guidance to the 20 SPP working groups of U.S., Mexican, and Canadian bureaucrats.

WND has also reported that President Bush will discuss at the summit a plan to send U.S. military assistance to Mexico to assist Mexico's military and civilian law enforcement agencies to combat Mexican narco-criminals and drug lords.

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: bushopenborderslobby; corsi; cuespookymusic; icecreammandrake; nau; preciousbodilyfluids; sapandimpurify; spp; sppsummit; tr; wnd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: calcowgirl; hedgetrimmer; Czar

I believe I recall reading about the funding for this in a bill proposed and passed in Congress.....I don’t have the means/ability right now to locate the information....but I clearly recall a bill which addressed funding, militarily equipping, and drug combatting in Mexico.....with U.S. taxpayer dollars.


41 posted on 08/13/2007 8:07:45 AM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

“Look, it’s a Blibbering Humdinger!”


42 posted on 08/13/2007 8:09:37 AM PDT by CholeraJoe ("I shall need the clankers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

No, just a bunch of demon possessed nuts who cannot deal with reality or think their way out of a paper bag.


43 posted on 08/13/2007 8:21:38 AM PDT by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: David Isaac

I’ve been told that there is a difference between the terms ‘globalism’ and ‘globalization’.

However, I believe I have heard them used interchangeably and some people call the difference ‘semantics’.

The one statement made by Thompson that bothers me is this:

“Global competition and a growing economic disparity among our citizens are challenges. But how we react to them is more important than the challenges themselves. Some want us to withdraw from the world that presents us with so many problems, in the hope they will go away. Some would push us towards protectionist trade policies. Others see a solution in raising taxes and redistributing the income among our citizens.

Wrong on all counts. These are defensive, defeatist policies that have consistently been proven wrong. They are not what America is all about.

We’re not afraid of globalization. It works to our benefit. We innovate more and invest in that innovation better than anywhere else in the world. Same thing goes for services. Free trade and market economies have done more for freedom and prosperity than a central planner could ever dream and we’re the world’s best example of that.”

As far and Republicans admitting they are ‘for’ globalism, digging a little deeper brings (bipartisan) statements like these from GHWB and Clinton:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvEqg_UlGaA


44 posted on 08/13/2007 8:32:13 AM PDT by Kimberly GG (DUNCAN HUNTER '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt

For demon possessed try Mexico. Lots of the dark arts, Santeria and black magic practitioners down there. Lots of it is pre Columbian


45 posted on 08/13/2007 9:00:17 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

He has no political sucide to commit. He is done. He’s still working for mexico. Now he is having secret meetings with foreign governments and will most likely make secret deals with them. Whoever runs for the Republicans in ‘08 will first have to run swiftly away from Holy George.


46 posted on 08/13/2007 9:53:25 AM PDT by twonie (Keep your guns - and stockpile ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Constantine XIII

If he does not see mexicans as huge threat to the US, then he is in big trouble, and by extension, so are we.


47 posted on 08/13/2007 9:56:44 AM PDT by twonie (Keep your guns - and stockpile ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Keep this quite, it’s a secret don’tcha know?........ Corsi is blabbing to the world from all the secret sources about what you aren’t supposed to know.


48 posted on 08/13/2007 10:02:40 AM PDT by deport ( Cue Spooky Music...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

My thoughts exactly. Only thing that makes senses.


49 posted on 08/13/2007 10:07:20 AM PDT by Califreak (Go Hunter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Constantine XIII
World Net Daily doesn’t count as a “large amount of information.”

It does count as a large amount of something,

I saw a large amount of something in a cow pasture last week...

50 posted on 08/13/2007 11:23:31 AM PDT by GreenLanternCorps (Thompson for President: 2008, 2012: Jindal for President 2016, 2020)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Constantine XIII

You have brought logic and reason to an NAU thread...

Your penalty is half the distance to the goal line and a loss of down!


51 posted on 08/13/2007 11:26:09 AM PDT by GreenLanternCorps (Thompson for President: 2008, 2012: Jindal for President 2016, 2020)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: twonie

A twonie? Isn’t that the toll to get across the internatonal bridge. I believe it works at Sarnia-Port Huron.


52 posted on 08/13/2007 11:32:35 AM PDT by David Isaac (Duncan Hunter '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

“As far as secrecy- How come these meetings aren’t open to the press? What’s the big deal going on behind closed doors?”

These are unanswered questions, and all are important


53 posted on 08/13/2007 11:41:44 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: twonie

How is it that you know about so called secret meetings?


54 posted on 08/13/2007 11:55:19 AM PDT by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Constantine XIII
As if we’d wake up one morning to a new North American superstate and no one would see it coming. That’s just absurd.

And Americans accepting a law like the Patriot Act was once absurd. But we did accept it, for certain reasons. Same thing here.

55 posted on 08/13/2007 12:06:13 PM PDT by ovrtaxt (Sworn to oppose control freaks, foreign and domestic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl; hedgetrimmer; nicmarlo
"a plan to send U.S. military assistance to Mexico to assist Mexico's military and civilian law enforcement agencies to combat Mexican narco-criminals and drug lords"

Face it. Bush is a NWO/globalist international busybody who has never met a country that didn't need U.S. intervention ("nation building").

56 posted on 08/13/2007 1:22:39 PM PDT by Czar ( StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
"I believe I recall reading about the funding for this in a bill proposed and passed in Congress....."

I don't recall seeing this one. Suspect it was another one of those "voice vote in the middle of the night" things meant to be hidden from the voters.

57 posted on 08/13/2007 1:26:19 PM PDT by Czar ( StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Who also ever thought in the 50 years since WWII, we would see a European superstate? How about Africa—it’s in the making right now. You saw massive changes in the world as new nations and NGOs were formed in a few years in the late 1940s. You’ve seen tremendous changes due to trade initiatives such as GATT, NAFTA.

There are many global treaties, organizations, constitutions, etc being forged.....I have full confidence at least some of them will succeed at one point.

Being a spiritual person, i believe the bible. It seems to indicate that the global government won’t be fully formed until a time when it is needed and it will be the antichrist who finishes locking it in place. something will happen to enable the peoples of the world to permit it.


58 posted on 08/13/2007 1:32:02 PM PDT by applpie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG
"digging a little deeper brings(bipartisan) statements"

This left versus right or bipartisanship is passe'. This globalization is the middle against the right and left. Remember Buchanan marching with the marxists/anarchists during the WTO Seattle riots.

The Social Democrats and the market capitalists are in lockstep, plus the third way-ers have slid into the mix. The only dis-agreement among these groups is who will benefit more, the unions-enviros-social justice crowd or the businessmen-investors.

59 posted on 08/13/2007 2:46:32 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
<


60 posted on 08/13/2007 2:53:12 PM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson