Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

3rd SPP summit shrouded in secrecy
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | August 13, 2007 | Jerome R. Corsi

Posted on 08/13/2007 4:04:42 AM PDT by Man50D

President Bush will interrupt his summer vacation in Crawford, Texas, next week to attend the third summit meeting of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, or SPP, slated for Aug. 20 and 21 in Montebello, Quebec, at the five-star Fairmont Le Chateau Montebello resort.

Bush will meet with Mexico's President Felipe Calderon and Canada's Prime Minister Stephen Harper at the event.

The meeting has been hidden in a cloud of secrecy until WND obtained from an Access to Information Act request a previously unreleased copy of a government report detailing agenda plans for the third SPP summit.

According to WND has reported that a multinational business agenda is driving this upcoming SPP summit according to the heavily redacted document obtained from the Canadian government.

The memo clearly states at center stage in the Montebello SPP summit will be recommendations by the North American Competitiveness Council, regarding promoting North American competitiveness for multinational corporations through "integrating" and "harmonizing" regulations between Mexico, Canada and the U.S.

The council, an executive group composed of 10 top multinational corporations from each of the three SPP countries, was constituted under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Commerce to provide guidance to the 20 SPP working groups of U.S., Mexican, and Canadian bureaucrats.

WND has also reported that President Bush will discuss at the summit a plan to send U.S. military assistance to Mexico to assist Mexico's military and civilian law enforcement agencies to combat Mexican narco-criminals and drug lords.

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: bushopenborderslobby; corsi; cuespookymusic; icecreammandrake; nau; preciousbodilyfluids; sapandimpurify; spp; sppsummit; tr; wnd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

1 posted on 08/13/2007 4:04:43 AM PDT by Man50D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Hmm Agenda item #1

“Make like we are going to secure the Mexico US border, then pass Shamnesty and drop that security stuff, it costs money and our God is the market”


2 posted on 08/13/2007 4:13:13 AM PDT by padre35 (Conservative in Exile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Is this about forming an EU of North America?


3 posted on 08/13/2007 4:16:15 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

Sure looks like it.


4 posted on 08/13/2007 4:19:43 AM PDT by doberville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

New title: We’ll get back to you when it’s not secret anymore.


5 posted on 08/13/2007 4:24:38 AM PDT by wolfcreek (2 bad Tyranny, Treachery and Treason never take a vacation...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer
Is this about forming an EU of North America?

That is exactly what it's about and most of the American citizens don't know it. This upsets me more than the illegal alien situation and lax border.

6 posted on 08/13/2007 4:25:51 AM PDT by YellowRoseofTx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

Yes.

Building a North American Community
http://canada.usembassy.gov/content/can_usa/northamericancommunity_TF_final.pdf

NO MORE CFR’ers IN ‘08!!!


7 posted on 08/13/2007 4:26:37 AM PDT by Kimberly GG (DUNCAN HUNTER '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: YellowRoseofTx

Like that could happen and no one would notice. :p

LOL


8 posted on 08/13/2007 4:27:43 AM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

Yes, but it looks like we won’t be able to vote on it, unlike the EU voters.


9 posted on 08/13/2007 4:28:15 AM PDT by nygoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Seriously, wtf?

There’s enough important stuff going on, especially on the border, that wasting time and credibility on nonsense like this is beyond ridiculous.

Sigh...


10 posted on 08/13/2007 4:29:19 AM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YellowRoseofTx

“That is exactly what it’s about and most of the American citizens don’t know it. This upsets me more than the illegal alien situation and lax border.”

Amnesty and securing an Open Border are part of the bipartisan CFR’s agenda for creating a NAU. IMO, if they can keep us focused on the ‘small’ steps, no one will notice the bigger picture.

NO MORE CFRers in ‘08!!!


11 posted on 08/13/2007 4:29:37 AM PDT by Kimberly GG (DUNCAN HUNTER '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Constantine XIII

It is NOT nonsense....connect the dots...see my post above.


12 posted on 08/13/2007 4:30:42 AM PDT by Kimberly GG (DUNCAN HUNTER '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Constantine XIII

This is the only explanation for the open border. Bush wouldn’t be committing political suicide over it otherwise.


13 posted on 08/13/2007 4:32:20 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (Sworn to oppose control freaks, foreign and domestic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG

Because vast evil conspiracies to overthrow the most powerful nation on earth regularly post their evil plans using “code words” that sound like diplomatic speak (in convenient PDF form, no less) on the internet for everyone to see, right?

That isn’t a very smart conspiracy. :p

Could this be another NAFTA that will mix up trade balances with ambiguous to moderately negative results for Average Joe American? Possibly.

Is it the End of the World as We Know It? Probably not.


14 posted on 08/13/2007 4:35:33 AM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Sigh.

Why would the President of the United States want to do away with the United States? What possible motive could he have?

Could it be that, right or wrong, he just doesn’t see Mexicans as a huge threat to national security?

Do we have to invoke Evil Plots to explain everything that ever happened anywhere?


15 posted on 08/13/2007 4:38:21 AM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Constantine XIII

Then what’s your explanation for his open borders stance? I’d love to hear a convincing reason.


16 posted on 08/13/2007 4:39:58 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (Sworn to oppose control freaks, foreign and domestic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
"WND has also reported that President Bush will discuss at the summit a plan to send U.S. military assistance to Mexico to assist Mexico's military and civilian law enforcement agencies to combat Mexican narco-criminals and drug lords."

Why no mention that he is also sending the U.S. Army to Quebec to keep eavesdroppers at bay during the summit?

17 posted on 08/13/2007 4:40:31 AM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
"The memo clearly states at center stage in the Montebello SPP summit will be recommendations by the North American Competitiveness Council"

Here is the NACC document listing all of NACC's rcommendations for 2007, 2008, and 2010.

Unfortunately, this document is 63 pages long, which makes it beyond the attention span and comprehensive level of most conspiricy kooks.

For those willing to read/study the document, there is some insight.

For example:

Recalling the recent SNAFU on passports, it is obvious the 07 recommendations on passports are being delayed.

Also, the recommendations on Pemex spinning off their natural gas operations gives a hint as to how Mexico will proceed in privatising Pemex.

Also, on how the Mexican grid will be privatised.

18 posted on 08/13/2007 4:43:32 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constantine XIII
Could it be that, right or wrong, he just doesn’t see Mexicans as a huge threat to national security?

That's stating the obvious considering he wants to grant amnesty to illegal aliens.

Do we have to invoke Evil Plots to explain everything that ever happened anywhere?

Your asking the wrong question. It should be how much longer will some people keep burying their heads in the sand despite the large amount of information detailing how we are losing our national sovereignty?
19 posted on 08/13/2007 4:44:32 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

Aything in there on changing Mexican real estate ownership law? In my opinion, that’s a critical piece of the puzzle, and the first indication that Mexico is actually going to contribute something besides their overrated laborers and disgusting corruption.


20 posted on 08/13/2007 4:48:05 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (Sworn to oppose control freaks, foreign and domestic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson