[counterpunch]

Mitt’s votes only cost about $450 each. Fred Thompson got over 200 votes without spending a dime.

Mitt = fewest votes per dollar
Fred = Most votes per dollar

Those are the facts.

So which one would you trust with your tax dollars?

[CheyennePress]

>>>Mitt = fewest votes per dollar
>>>Fred = Most votes per dollar
>>>So which one would you trust with your tax dollars?<<<

Probably the one who wouldn’t be asleep at the wheel or AWOL when it came time to veto a Congressional spending bill. And probably also the one who would address the American people on the specifics on why he was doing what he was doing. :)

Mitt: 1
Fred: 0

[roscommon]

My initial thought regarding Fred’s candidacy was that he was colluding with another candidate to kill the momentum from some of the other top tier candidates. Then that thought gradually evolved into thinking that he was legit and was playing a smart game by delaying his official announcement. Now I think this delay of his is more a sign of his inability to organize and run an efficient campaign - not a good sign. I’m getting to the point where I won’t even consider him.

Fred *really* needs to sh&t or get off the pot.

-Roscommon

[elizabetty]

Fred Thompson got over 200 votes without spending a dime. Mitt = fewest votes per dollar Fred = Most votes per dollar

An independent Fred Thompson group paid $10,000 for a table space at the Ames Straw Poll to advance Fred Thompson's position in the poll.