Now our observations about the universe have to be attacked, I see. I had no idea Darwin was an astronomer.
So now any theoiry that postulates the universe as older than 6,000 years in age is “Darwinism”, right? How long before geocentriam is “real science”, and anything else is “Darwinism”?
Hell, let’s just save a bunch of grief and go back to a flat earth.
(Let’s try again with the typos cleaned up.)
Now our observations about the universe have to be attacked, I see. I had no idea Darwin was an astronomer.
So now any theory that postulates the universe as older than 6,000 years in age is “Darwinism”, right? How long before geocentrism is “real science”, and anything else is “Darwinism”?
Hell, let’s just save a bunch of grief and go back to a flat earth.
Go back? You mean it isn't flat? You mean the sun doesn't orbit around the earth? Get out!
==So now any theoiry that postulates the universe as older than 6,000 years in age is “Darwinism”, right?
Nope, but Darwinism and a young universe can’t be true at the same time.
Darwinism depends on millions and millions of years. If it can be demonstrated that the universe is not, in fact, millions of years old, Darwinism will not have a leg to stand on.