[[Again and again, every time studies and analyses like this — and every other conceivable type — are performed, the results “just happen” to fall in a way that makes perfect sense if modern (and fossil) life had arisen from earlier life forms in a common-descent, evolutionary process, like individual jigsaw puzzle pieces all of which form a smooth, coherent picture (albeit with some pieces still not yet discovered) where all the pieces found so far all mesh smoothly with their neighbors]]
And again and again, the eivdnece falls to support another hypothesis- one of special creation and not common descent- the only problem is that those who dissagee often fall into character assasinating and belittling hte other hypothsis advocates- ridiculing htem in hopes I guess of squashing any of hte counter evidneces that support the special creation hypothesis. Science indeed!!!
Correct, it does fail to support that. Example: The Fossil Record: Evolution or "Scientific Creation"
the only problem is that those who dissagee often fall into character assasinating and belittling hte other hypothsis advocates- ridiculing htem
Yes, I've noticed that the anti-science people do that quite frequently.
in hopes I guess of squashing any of hte counter evidneces that support the special creation hypothesis. Science indeed!!!
Excuse me? If you have any "counter evidnceces [sic]" that "support the special creation hypothesis", you should have actually posted it instead of just rambling.