Four Evidences of Cosmic Youth ("more empirically justifiable to infer young ages than old ages")

Creation-Evolution Headlines ^ | August 4, 2007

[Red Badger]

What about rings around Uranus?..................

[stillwaiting]

for perusal later...

[GodGunsGuts]

ping

[GodGunsGuts]

==What about rings around Uranus?......

What about them?

[GovernmentIsTheProblem]

This article is one big non sequiter.

[Red Badger]

Any close ups?.......

[GodGunsGuts]

==Any close ups?.......

I’m sure you can find close ups of the rings around Uranus all by your lonesome.

[Tax-chick]

My oldest daughter is a Cosmic Youth. She has blue hair.

And one of my sons if definitely an alien.

[RightWhale]

science should tether itself to the observations rather than run amok like a stray dog.

It does.

[PetroniusMaximus]

“What about rings around Uranus?..................”

Send a probe.

[GodGunsGuts]

==It does.

Not when the Church of Darwin gets involved.

[RightWhale]

Cute, but feeble analogy.

[GodGunsGuts]

==Send a probe.

Don’t get him excited...the proposed journey might get him in trouble with his wife.

[GodGunsGuts]

==Cute, but feeble analogy.

Cult of Darwin?

[RightWhale]

Buy gold! Use it to armor the compound.

[Alter Kaker]

Not when the Church of Darwin gets involved.

That's nice, but what does the bizarre cosmological argument presented in this argument have to do with evolution??

[Coyoteman]

We think science should tether itself to the observations rather than run amok like a stray dog.

Perhaps young earth creationists should stick to religion and leave science to the scientists?

[CFC__VRWC]

Now our observations about the universe have to be attacked, I see. I had no idea Darwin was an astronomer.

So now any theoiry that postulates the universe as older than 6,000 years in age is “Darwinism”, right? How long before geocentriam is “real science”, and anything else is “Darwinism”?

Hell, let’s just save a bunch of grief and go back to a flat earth.

[CFC__VRWC]

(Let’s try again with the typos cleaned up.)

Now our observations about the universe have to be attacked, I see. I had no idea Darwin was an astronomer.

So now any theory that postulates the universe as older than 6,000 years in age is “Darwinism”, right? How long before geocentrism is “real science”, and anything else is “Darwinism”?

Hell, let’s just save a bunch of grief and go back to a flat earth.